Bonilla v. Rolefson

Filing 3

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATING ALL PENDING MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/16/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 IN RE STEVEN BONILLA, Nos. C 11-2808 CW (PR) C 11-2823 CW (PR) C 11-2824 CW (PR) 4 Plaintiff. 5 / 6 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATING ALL PENDING MOTIONS 8 9 Plaintiff Steven Bonilla has been sentenced to death by the United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Superior Court of California for the County of Alameda. 11 incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison. 12 habeas case currently is being litigated, he filed a request for 13 appointment of counsel for his future federal habeas litigation in 14 this Court. 15 to Habeas Local Rule 2254-25, this Court granted his request for 16 appointment of counsel and referred the matter to the Northern 17 District’s Selection Board for the recommendation of qualified 18 counsel to represent Plaintiff in his federal habeas proceedings. 19 Additionally, pursuant to Habeas Local Rule 2254-24(a), the Court 20 granted Plaintiff's concurrent request for a stay of execution. 21 (Docket no. 3.) 22 He is Although his State See Bonilla v. Ayers, No. C 08-0471 CW (PR). Pursuant Although Plaintiff's State habeas case is pending, Plaintiff 23 has filed numerous pro se requests and motions in C 08-0471. All 24 of the requests and motions have been denied by this Court or 25 withdrawn by Plaintiff. 26 Court issued an Order telling Plaintiff that no further filings 27 regarding CR 88-259 MISC AJZ (Grand Jury proceedings) would be 28 accepted by this Court. In particular, on February 16, 2011, the (Docket no. 34.) Additionally, the Court 1 dismissed with prejudice In re: Steven Wayne Bonilla, No. C 11-0441 2 CW (PR), a pro se complaint filed by Plaintiff regarding CR 88-259 3 MISC AJZ. 4 pro se motions filed by Plaintiff in C 08-0471. 5 Court wrote: 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 (Id.) On March 29, 2011, the Court denied several more In doing so, the As this Court has stated multiple times, Petitioner’s state habeas case is still pending in the state court. The Court reiterates to Petitioner that challenges to his state trial conviction must be reviewed by the state courts before being considered by the federal court. Until that time, Petitioner’s various claims in his pro se pleadings are not ripe for this Court to consider. (Docket no. 54 at 2:16-22.) Most recently, Plaintiff filed thirteen pro se civil rights 12 actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 13 an Order dismissing all of said actions for the reason none of the 14 allegations in Plaintiff's complaints stated a claim for relief 15 under § 1983. 16 lawfulness of confinement or its duration can be addressed only by 17 way of habeas corpus, the Court concluded as follows: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On June 13, 2011, the Court issued After explaining to Plaintiff that challenges to the Here, in an apparent attempt to circumvent this Court's prior admonition to Plaintiff that no further filings regarding CR 88–259 MISC AJZ would be accepted by the Court and that additional unripe pro se motions in C 080471 would be denied, Plaintiff has filed the instant civil rights complaints in which he seeks access to certain discovery, witness testimony, declarations and other information that he claims would render his death penalty conviction invalid, including information regarding CR 88-259 MISC AJZ. Because all of Plaintiff's civil rights complaints seek relief that must be pursued by way of habeas corpus, all of the instant civil rights actions are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff's bringing his claims in a federal habeas petition. See Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa, 49 F.3d 583, 586 (9th Cir. 1995). Plaintiff is reminded, however, that he must heed the Court's prior admonitions before filing additional pro se matters in C 08-0471. 27 Order of Dismissal at 2:28-3:15. 28 2 1 Now pending before the Court are three new pro se civil rights 2 actions filed by Plaintiff. 3 civil rights actions, these actions seek access to information that 4 would render Plaintiff's death penalty conviction invalid. 5 Accordingly, the actions are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to 6 Plaintiff's bringing his claims in a federal habeas petition. 7 Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa, 49 F.3d 583, 586 (9th Cir. 1995). 8 Additionally, because the Court has determined that none of As with Plaintiff's thirteen previous See the instant civil rights complaints can proceed as a civil rights 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 9 action but, instead, must be dismissed, the Clerk of the Court is 11 hereby DIRECTED to terminate, in each action, Plaintiff's pending 12 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 13 No filing fee is due. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in each of the 14 above civil rights actions, terminate all pending motions therein, 15 and close the files. 16 of this Order in C 08-0471. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court also shall file a copy 18 19 Dated: 6/16/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 STEVEN W BONILLA, Case Number: CV11-02808 CW(PR) CV11-2823 CW (PR) CV11-2824 CW (PR) 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 QUINTIN L SMITH et al, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 Defendant. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on June 16, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 13 14 16 Steven Wayne Bonilla J-48500 San Quentin State Prison San Quentin, CA 94964 17 Dated: June 16, 2011 15 18 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?