New Sensations, Inc v. Does 2-1768

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO SERVE TIMELY. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/5/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

NEW SENSATIONS, INC.,

5

No. C 11-02835 CW

Plaintiff,

6

v.

7

ORDER DISMISSING
CASE FOR FAILURE
TO SERVE TIMELY

DOES 2-1768,

8
9

Defendants.
________________________________/

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

On December 23, 2010, Plaintiff New Sensations, Inc. filed a

13

lawsuit for copyright infringement against 1,768 Doe Defendants.

14

See New Sensations, Inc. v. Does 1-1768, Case No. C 10-5864 PSG

15

(N.D. Cal.).

16

Plaintiff’s original complaint was assigned severed Does 2 through

17

1,768 from the original action.

18

against Does 2 through 1,768 were reassigned to the undersigned

19

and the complaint was re-filed under this case number.

20

11, 2011, the Court severed and dismissed without prejudice the

21

claims against Does 3 through 1,768 based on misjoinder.

On May 31, 2011, the magistrate judge to whom

On that same day, the claims

On August

22

On September 16, 2011, the Court warned Plaintiff that

23

failure to submit proof of service on Doe 2 by September 28, 2011

24

would result in dismissal of its action for failure to serve

25

timely.

26
27
28

1
2
3

Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service.

Thus, the Court

dismisses Plaintiff’s action for failure to serve timely.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

Dated: 10/5/2011

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2