Blackmon et al v. Tobias
Filing
140
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 139 Motion extension of 60 day conditional (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
OAKLAND DIVISION
7
8 JAMES BLACKMON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
9
10
Case No: C 11-02853 SBA
ORDER
Docket 139
vs.
11 GLENN TOBIAS, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
On October 9, 2012, the Court issued a 60-day conditional dismissal in this action.
15
Dkt. 131. On December 4, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion requesting that the Court's
16
October 9, 2012 Order be modified to extend the deadline for filing a motion to reopen the
17
case to February 28, 2013. Dkt. 132. On December 11, 2012, the Court issued an Order
18
granting the extension requested by Plaintiffs. Dkt. 135. On February 20, 2013, Plaintiffs
19
filed a motion requesting that the Court further extend the deadline to file a motion to
20
reopen the case to April 30, 2013. Dkt. 136. On February 26, 2013, the Court granted the
21
motion. Dkt. 138. The parties are presently before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion to
22
further extend the deadline to file a motion to reopen the case. Dkt. 139. In the instant
23
motion, Plaintiffs request that the deadline be extended to June 30, 2013 to allow the parties
24
additional time to prepare and complete the written settlement agreement. Id. The Court
25
finds that good cause exists for such an extension. Accordingly,
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED. The parties
27
shall have until June 30, 2013 to request that the Court reopen the case and restore the
28
matter to its active civil calendar. The Court will not grant any further extensions to file a
1
motion to reopen the case absent a showing of exigent circumstances. This Order
2
terminates Docket 139.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 5/3/13
______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?