Raifman et al v. Wachovia Securities, LLC et al

Filing 166

ORDER re 165 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Exceed Reply Brief Page Limit filed by Bruce Cardinal, Susan Raifman, Gregory R. Raifman, Lorraine Kurata, Wachovia Securities, LLC, Edward Kurata, Jeffrey Chou, Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, James Loomis. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/10/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

RONALD E. WOOD, SBN 133854
[e-mail]
JENNIFER L. ROCHE, SBN 254538
[e-mail]
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3200
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-557-2193
DAVID A. PICON (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
Eleven Times Square
New York, NY 10036-8299
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212-969-2900
Attorneys for Defendant
Wachovia Securities, LLC,
n/k/a Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

GREGORY R. RAIFMAN and SUSAN
RAIFMAN, husband and wife, individually and
on behalf of their marital community and as
Trustees of the RAIFMAN FAMILY
REVOCABLE INTERVIVOS TRUST and as
beneficiaries of the PALLADIAN TRUST;
GEKKO HOLDINGS, LLC; EDWARD and
LORRAINE KURATA, as husband and wife;
JAMES LOOMIS; JEFFREY CHOU; and
BRUCE CARDINAL, as Trustee of the
ROBERT J. CARDINAL
GRANDCHILDREN’S TRUST, and the
MARION I. CARDINAL TRUST, and as
Managing Member of REDBIRD
INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC

22
23
24

Case No. C 11-02885 SBA

STIPULATION TO EXCEED REPLY
BRIEF PAGE LIMIT
Action Filed: April 1, 2011
[Removed from California State Court]
Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong

Plaintiffs,
v.
WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, N/K/A
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC,

25
Defendant.
26
27
28
Case No. C 11-02885 SBA
STIPULATION TO EXCEED REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT

1

Whereas, on May 2, 2013, Plaintiffs Gregory R. Raifman and Susan Raifman, husband and

2

wife, individually and on behalf of their marital community and as Trustees of The Raifman Family

3

Revocable Inter Vivos Trust, as beneficiaries of The Palladian Trust, and as sole members of Gekko

4

Holdings, LLC; Edward and Lorraine Kurata, husband and wife; James Loomis; Jeffrey Chou; and

5

Bruce Cardinal, as Trustee of the Robert J. Cardinal Grandchildren’s Trust, and as Trustee of the

6

Marion I. Cardinal Trust, and as Managing Member of Redbird Investment Group, LLC

7

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed their Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) in this action, pursuant to

8

an agreement between the parties and the Order of this Court;

9

Whereas, on May 8, 2013, Defendant Wachovia Securities, LLC (“Wachovia”) filed its

10

Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ TAC which, pursuant to stipulation and Court Order, exceeded this

11

Court’s motion page limit by five pages;

12

Whereas, on May 29, 2013, Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to Wachovia’s Motion to

13

Dismiss which, pursuant to stipulation and Court Order, exceeded this Court’s opposition page limit

14

by six pages; and,

15

Whereas Wachovia believes it needs more than the ten pages permitted by the Court’s

16

Standing Order to fully and properly address all issues raised and argument made in Plaintiffs’

17

Opposition to Wachovia’s Motion to Dismiss;

18

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant

19

to Local Rule 7-11(a), that Wachovia may exceed the ten page limit for its reply brief by five pages,

20

and file a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss not to exceed 15 pages.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

DATED: June 7, 2013

DAVID A. PICON
RONALD E. WOOD
JENNIFER L. ROCHE
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
/s/ Ronald E. Wood
Ronald E. Wood
Attorneys for Defendant

28

2
STIPULATION TO EXCEED REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT

1

DATED: June 7, 2013

TOD ARONOVITZ
BARBARA PEREZ
ANDREW ZELMANOWITZ

2
3
4

/s/ Tod Aronovitz
Tod Aronovitz

5

Attorney for Plaintiffs

6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8

DATED: ___6/10/13__________

9
_________________________________
Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION TO EXCEED REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT