Raifman et al v. Wachovia Securities, LLC et al
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Stipulation, filed by Helicon Investments, Ltd., George Gordon, III, Susan Raifman, Gekko Holdings, LLC, Gregory R. Raifman, Wachovia Securities, LLC. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/30/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN ROOD
Steven Rood (Cal. Bar No. 69332)
E-mail: steve@steverood.com
405 – 14th Street, Ste. 212
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510-839-0900
Facsimile: 510-839-0230
8
ISAACSON &WILSON, P.S.
Mark J. Wilson (Cal. Bar No. 96985)
Email: thmjwilson@isaacsonwilson.com
1200 5 Avenue, Ste. 1900
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: 206-448-1011
Facsimile: 206-448-1022
9
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
GREGORY R. RAIFMAN and SUSAN
RAIFMAN, husband and wife, individually
and on behalf of their marital community
and as Trustees of the RAIFMAN FAMILY
REVOCABLE INTERVIVOS TRUST and
as beneficiaries of the PALLADIAN
TRUST; GEKKO HOLDINGS, LLC, and
HELICON INVESTMENTS, LTD,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY
(Endorsement for Proposed Order is
included herein)
Plaintiffs,
19
20
Case No.: No. C 11-02885 SBA
HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS:
vs.
22
WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, N/K/A
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS LLC;
GEORGE GORDON, III, individually; and
ROBERT EDDY, individually,
23
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:
December 6, 2011
1:00 pm
1
Hon. Sandra B. Armstrong
Defendants.
21
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through their
respective counsel of record, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2 that Plaintiffs’ Opposition
to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which was originally due on August 5, 2011, may be
extended to September 9, 2011.
1
Stipulation to Extend Time of Plaintiffs to Respond to Motion to Dismiss and
For Defendants to Reply
Case No. C 11-02885 SBA
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants may have until
October 6, 2011 to reply to Plaintiffs’ response to the Motion to Dismiss.
Plaintiffs submit the Declaration of Mark J. Wilson in support of this Stipulation and
Proposed Order, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a).
A section for the Court’s endorsement is appended below, pursuant to Local Rule 7-12.
6
7
Dated: August ____, 2011
MARK J. WILSON
ISAACSON & WILSON, P.S.
8
9
10
11
Mark J. Wilson
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
14
Dated: August ____, 2011
15
RONALD E. WOOD
JENNIFER L. ROCHE
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
16
17
18
Ronald E. Wood
19
Attorneys for Defendants
WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC and
GEORGE GORDON III
20
21
22
23
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
Dated: _8/30/11
____________________________
Hon. Sandra B. Armstrong
United States District Judge
28
2
Stipulation to Extend Time of Plaintiffs to Respond to Motion to Dismiss and
For Defendants to Reply
Case No. C 11-02885 SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?