Raifman et al v. Wachovia Securities, LLC et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Stipulation, filed by Helicon Investments, Ltd., George Gordon, III, Susan Raifman, Gekko Holdings, LLC, Gregory R. Raifman, Wachovia Securities, LLC. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/30/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN ROOD Steven Rood (Cal. Bar No. 69332) E-mail: steve@steverood.com 405 – 14th Street, Ste. 212 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: 510-839-0900 Facsimile: 510-839-0230 8 ISAACSON &WILSON, P.S. Mark J. Wilson (Cal. Bar No. 96985) Email: thmjwilson@isaacsonwilson.com 1200 5 Avenue, Ste. 1900 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: 206-448-1011 Facsimile: 206-448-1022 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 GREGORY R. RAIFMAN and SUSAN RAIFMAN, husband and wife, individually and on behalf of their marital community and as Trustees of the RAIFMAN FAMILY REVOCABLE INTERVIVOS TRUST and as beneficiaries of the PALLADIAN TRUST; GEKKO HOLDINGS, LLC, and HELICON INVESTMENTS, LTD, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY (Endorsement for Proposed Order is included herein) Plaintiffs, 19 20 Case No.: No. C 11-02885 SBA HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS: vs. 22 WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, N/K/A WELLS FARGO ADVISORS LLC; GEORGE GORDON, III, individually; and ROBERT EDDY, individually, 23 Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: December 6, 2011 1:00 pm 1 Hon. Sandra B. Armstrong Defendants. 21 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2 that Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which was originally due on August 5, 2011, may be extended to September 9, 2011. 1 Stipulation to Extend Time of Plaintiffs to Respond to Motion to Dismiss and For Defendants to Reply Case No. C 11-02885 SBA 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants may have until October 6, 2011 to reply to Plaintiffs’ response to the Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs submit the Declaration of Mark J. Wilson in support of this Stipulation and Proposed Order, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a). A section for the Court’s endorsement is appended below, pursuant to Local Rule 7-12. 6 7 Dated: August ____, 2011 MARK J. WILSON ISAACSON & WILSON, P.S. 8 9 10 11 Mark J. Wilson 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 Dated: August ____, 2011 15 RONALD E. WOOD JENNIFER L. ROCHE PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 16 17 18 Ronald E. Wood 19 Attorneys for Defendants WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC and GEORGE GORDON III 20 21 22 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 Dated: _8/30/11 ____________________________ Hon. Sandra B. Armstrong United States District Judge 28 2 Stipulation to Extend Time of Plaintiffs to Respond to Motion to Dismiss and For Defendants to Reply Case No. C 11-02885 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?