Raifman et al v. Wachovia Securities, LLC et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Stipulation, filed by Helicon Investments, Ltd., George Gordon, III, Susan Raifman, Gekko Holdings, LLC, Gregory R. Raifman, Wachovia Securities, LLC. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/30/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN ROOD
Steven Rood (Cal. Bar No. 69332)
E-mail: [e-mail]
405 – 14th Street, Ste. 212
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 510-839-0230

8

ISAACSON &WILSON, P.S.
Mark J. Wilson (Cal. Bar No. 96985)
Email: [e-mail]
1200 5 Avenue, Ste. 1900
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 206-448-1022

9

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6
7

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18

GREGORY R. RAIFMAN and SUSAN
RAIFMAN, husband and wife, individually
and on behalf of their marital community
and as Trustees of the RAIFMAN FAMILY
REVOCABLE INTERVIVOS TRUST and
as beneficiaries of the PALLADIAN
TRUST; GEKKO HOLDINGS, LLC, and
HELICON INVESTMENTS, LTD,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY
(Endorsement for Proposed Order is
included herein)

Plaintiffs,

19
20

Case No.: No. C 11-02885 SBA

HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS:
vs.

22

WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, N/K/A
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS LLC;
GEORGE GORDON, III, individually; and
ROBERT EDDY, individually,

23

Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:

December 6, 2011
1:00 pm
1
Hon. Sandra B. Armstrong

Defendants.

21

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through their
respective counsel of record, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2 that Plaintiffs’ Opposition
to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which was originally due on August 5, 2011, may be
extended to September 9, 2011.

1
Stipulation to Extend Time of Plaintiffs to Respond to Motion to Dismiss and
For Defendants to Reply
Case No. C 11-02885 SBA

1
2
3
4
5

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants may have until
October 6, 2011 to reply to Plaintiffs’ response to the Motion to Dismiss.
Plaintiffs submit the Declaration of Mark J. Wilson in support of this Stipulation and
Proposed Order, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a).
A section for the Court’s endorsement is appended below, pursuant to Local Rule 7-12.

6
7

Dated: August ____, 2011
MARK J. WILSON
ISAACSON & WILSON, P.S.

8
9
10
11

Mark J. Wilson

12

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

13
14

Dated: August ____, 2011

15

RONALD E. WOOD
JENNIFER L. ROCHE
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

16
17
18

Ronald E. Wood

19

Attorneys for Defendants
WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC and
GEORGE GORDON III

20
21
22
23

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27

Dated: _8/30/11

____________________________
Hon. Sandra B. Armstrong
United States District Judge

28
2
Stipulation to Extend Time of Plaintiffs to Respond to Motion to Dismiss and
For Defendants to Reply
Case No. C 11-02885 SBA