Raifman et al v. Wachovia Securities, LLC et al
Filing
65
DISCOVERY ORDER re 64 Joint Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/28/2012. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
GREGORY RAIFMAN, et al.,
5
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. C 11-2885 SBA (MEJ)
ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR STAY
OF DISCOVERY
6
WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, et al.,
Re: Docket No. 64
7
8
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
9
request to stay discovery pending ruling on their motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 64. A two-pronged
12
For the Northern District of California
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ joint discovery dispute letter, regarding Defendants’
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
test is used to determine whether a protective order should issue staying discovery. Hall v. Tilton,
13
2010 WL 539679, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2010) (citation omitted). First, a pending motion must be
14
potentially dispositive of the entire case, or at least dispositive on the issue at which discovery is
15
directed. Id. And second, the Court must determine whether the pending dispositive motion can be
16
decided absent discovery. Id.
17
As to the first issue, it appears that the pending motion is potentially dispositive of the entire
18
case. Jt. Ltr. at 2-3. As to the second issue, there is no indication that the pending motion can not be
19
decided absent discovery. The motion to dismiss is fully briefed, and the District Court advised the
20
parties on December 2, 2011 that it had taken the matter off calendar and under submission. Dkt.
21
No. 61. Thus, it appears that the District Court has concluded that it has all it needs in order to rule
22
on the merits. Further, at no time did Plaintiffs argue that they needed any particular discovery to
23
supplement the allegations of their Complaint. Accordingly, Defendants’ request is GRANTED.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 28, 2012
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?