Pantoja v. BAC Home Servicing, LP et al
Filing
19
ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Of Plaintiff Demetrio Pantoja; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof. Responses due by 11/18/2011. Replies due by 11/25/2011.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/8/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6 DEMETRIO P. PANTOJA,
Plaintiff,
7
8
vs.
Case No: C 11-2946 SBA
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF
TO FILE RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS
9 BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP FKA
COUNTRY WIDE HOME LOANS
10 SERVICING L.P., organized and existing
under law of New York, RECONSTRUST
11 COMPANY, N.A., is organized and exists
under the laws of the State of Texas,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
Plaintiff Demetrio P. Pantoja, acting pro se, filed the instant mortgage fraud action in
16
this Court on June 15, 2011. Dkt. 1. On July 8, 2011, Defendants BAC Home Loans
17
Servicing, LP and ReconTrust Company, N.A., filed a motion to dismiss under Federal
18
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. 15.1 Under Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), an opposition
19
to a motion must be filed within fourteen days of the date the motion was filed, and the
20
reply is due seven days thereafter. As such, Plaintiff’s response to the motion should have
21
been filed by no later than July 22, 2011. To date, Plaintiff has not filed any response to
22
Defendants’ motion.
23
This Court’s Standing Orders warn that the failure to file a response to a motion may
24
be deemed to be a consent to the granting of the unopposed motion. Dkt. 14 at 5. As such,
25
it is well within the discretion of the Court to grant Defendants’ motion as unopposed and
26
1
The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Laporte. The case was
reassigned to this Court on August 5, 2011. Dkt. 13. On August 26, 2011, Defendants
renoticed their motion and the matter was set for hearing on December 13, 2011. Dkt. 15,
28 18.
27
1
dismiss the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir.
2
1995). Nevertheless, mindful of its obligation to first consider to less drastic alternatives,
3
the Court will afford Plaintiff one further opportunity to respond to the pending motion.
4
Accordingly,
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff shall have until November 18, 2011 to
6
file and serve his response (i.e., either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition) to
7
Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Plaintiff’s response shall comply in all
8
respects with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court’s Civil Local Rules
9
including, without limitation, Civil Local Rules 7-3 through 7-5. PLAINTIFF IS
10
WARNED THAT THE FAILURE TO FILE A RESPONSE BY THIS DEADLINE
11
AND/OR TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE
12
PROCEDURAL RULES WILL RESULT IN THE GRANTING OF THE PENDING
13
MOTION AND THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION. In the event Plaintiff timely
14
files a response, Defendants may file a reply seven days after the deadline for Plaintiff’s
15
response.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 8, 2011
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
PANTOJA et al,
4
Plaintiff,
5
v.
6
BAC HOME SERVICING, LP et al,
7
Defendant.
/
8
9
Case Number: CV11-02946 SBA
10
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
11
12
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
13
14
15
That on November 9, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
Demetrio P. Pantoja
1857 Letterkenny Drive
Lincoln, CA 95648
19
20
Dated: November 9, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
21
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?