Diacakis v. Comcast Corporation

Filing 105

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 104 Stipulation (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

OAKLAND DIVISION

7
8 ATHANASSIOS DIACAKIS, individually

No: C 11-3002 SBA

and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
9

Plaintiff,
10

vs.

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION
TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND
DISPOSTIVE MOTIONS
DEADLINES

11

COMCAST CORPORATION, and DOES 1-

Dkt. 104

12 10, inclusive,
13

Defendants.

14
15

The parties’ stipulated request to continue discovery and dispositive motion

16

deadlines is DENIED for failure to demonstrate good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4)

17

(“Modifying a Schedule. A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the

18

judge’s consent.”); Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 610 (9th Cir.

19

1992) (“The district court may modify the pretrial schedule ‘if it cannot reasonably be met

20

despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.’”) (citation omitted). This Order

21

terminates Docket 104.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 26, 2013

_____________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge