Carnahan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 Stipulation filed by Susan Carnahan, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/3/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)

1

4

KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
GLENN R. KANTOR, Bar No. 122643
[e-mail]
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California, 91324
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: (818 350-6272

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN CARNAHAN

6

SEDGWICK, LLP
REBECCA HULL Bar No. 99802
ERIN CORNELL Bar No. 227135
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3

7
8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendant
METROPLITAN LIFE INSUARANCE COMPANY

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16

SUSAN CARNAHAN,

17

Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21

CASE NO: CV 11-03064-SBA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STRIKE
CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.

22
23
24

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff SUSAN CARNAHAN, and

25

Defendant METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, through their respective

26

counsel of record, that affirmative defenses two, five and seven, pled by Defendant in its Answer

27

to Plaintiff’s Complaint, shall be stricken without prejudice.

28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

DATED: December 20, 2011

KANTOR & KANTOR LLP

4
By: /s/ Glenn R. Kantor
Glenn R. Kantor
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUSAN CARNAHAN

5
6
7
8

DATED: December 20, 2011

SEDGWICK LLP

9
By: /s/ Erin Cornell
Rebecca Hull
Erin Cornell
Attorneys for Defendant METROPOLITAN LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY

10
11
12
13
14

ORDER

15
16

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, affirmative defenses two, five and seven, pled

17

by Defendant in its Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, shall be stricken without prejudice.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED

19

DATE: 1/3/12

20

_____________________________
HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES