Carnahan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
45
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 42 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Glenn R. Kantor, State Bar No. 122643
E-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net
Beth A. Davis, State Bar No. 277560
E-mail: bdavis@kantorlaw.net
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, CA 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818) 350-6272
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
SUSAN CARNAHAN
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
(818) 886 2525
12
SUSAN CARNAHAN,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
CASE NO: CV11-03064-SBA
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
REQUESTING TO FILE A PORTION OF
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL AND
ORDER
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY and THE SHAW GROUP INC.
LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,
17
Defendants.
18
19
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(c) and 79-5(d) and the Stipulated Order of
20
Confidentiality signed by Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on June 27, 2012, plaintiff,
21
Susan Carnahan, hereby files the instant Administrative Motion requesting to file a portion of
22
certain documents, submitted in connection with the parties’ respective Motions for Judgment,
23
under seal.
24
25
26
27
28
-1Administrative Motion Requesting to File a Portion of Documents Under Seal and [Proposed] Order
1
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
2
On June 28, 2012, Plaintiff received from Defendant additional documents labeled
3
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Claim Management Guidelines. These documents were
4
designated as confidential by defendant under a Stipulated Order of Confidentiality. Pursuant to
5
Civil L. R. 79-5, plaintiff hereby files this Administrative Motion requesting to file a portion of the
6
following documents, as shown by annotation in the documents, under seal:
1. Plaintiff’s Responsive Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (originally
8
submitted on 07/02/12 and resubmitted herewith).
9
2. Exhibit A to the Declaration of Glenn R. Kantor in Support of Metropolitan Life
10
Insurance Company Claim Management Guidelines pages ADMIN 000509, ADMIN
11
000512 and ADMIN 000513 (originally submitted on 07/02/12 and resubmitted herewith).
12
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
(818) 886 2525
7
3. Plaintiff’s Opening Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (already filed
13
with the Court as ECF Document #24).
14
4. Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Objection to Plaintiff’s Extrinsic Evidence
15
Submitted with Her Motion for Judgment; Request to Strike (originally submitted on
16
07/10/12 and resubmitted herewith).
17
18
Dated: July 26, 2012
Kantor & Kantor, LLP
19
20
21
22
By:
/s/ Beth A. Davis
Beth A. Davis
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Susan Carnahan
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Administrative Motion Requesting to File a Portion of Documents Under Seal and [Proposed] Order
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to Plaintiffs Administrative Motion Requesting to File a Portion of Certain
3
Documents Under Seal, those portions as shown by annotation in the documents, of Plaintiff’s
4
Responsive Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, Exhibit A to the Declaration of
5
Glenn R. Kantor in Support of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Claim Management
6
Guidelines pages ADMIN 000509, ADMIN 000512 and ADMIN 000513, Plaintiff’s Opening
7
Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (already filed with the Court as ECF
8
Document #24) and Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Objection to Plaintiff’s Extrinsic
9
Evidence Submitted with Her Motion for Judgment; Request to Strike, may be filed under seal.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
(818) 886 2525
12
13
DATED: 8/1/12
___________________________
SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3Administrative Motion Requesting to File a Portion of Documents Under Seal and [Proposed] Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?