Carnahan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 45

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 42 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Glenn R. Kantor, State Bar No. 122643 E-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net Beth A. Davis, State Bar No. 277560 E-mail: bdavis@kantorlaw.net KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, CA 91324 Telephone: (818) 886-2525 Facsimile: (818) 350-6272 Attorneys for Plaintiff, SUSAN CARNAHAN 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California 91324 (818) 886 2525 12 SUSAN CARNAHAN, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 vs. CASE NO: CV11-03064-SBA ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING TO FILE A PORTION OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL AND ORDER METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and THE SHAW GROUP INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(c) and 79-5(d) and the Stipulated Order of 20 Confidentiality signed by Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on June 27, 2012, plaintiff, 21 Susan Carnahan, hereby files the instant Administrative Motion requesting to file a portion of 22 certain documents, submitted in connection with the parties’ respective Motions for Judgment, 23 under seal. 24 25 26 27 28 -1Administrative Motion Requesting to File a Portion of Documents Under Seal and [Proposed] Order 1 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 2 On June 28, 2012, Plaintiff received from Defendant additional documents labeled 3 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Claim Management Guidelines. These documents were 4 designated as confidential by defendant under a Stipulated Order of Confidentiality. Pursuant to 5 Civil L. R. 79-5, plaintiff hereby files this Administrative Motion requesting to file a portion of the 6 following documents, as shown by annotation in the documents, under seal: 1. Plaintiff’s Responsive Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (originally 8 submitted on 07/02/12 and resubmitted herewith). 9 2. Exhibit A to the Declaration of Glenn R. Kantor in Support of Metropolitan Life 10 Insurance Company Claim Management Guidelines pages ADMIN 000509, ADMIN 11 000512 and ADMIN 000513 (originally submitted on 07/02/12 and resubmitted herewith). 12 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California 91324 (818) 886 2525 7 3. Plaintiff’s Opening Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (already filed 13 with the Court as ECF Document #24). 14 4. Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Objection to Plaintiff’s Extrinsic Evidence 15 Submitted with Her Motion for Judgment; Request to Strike (originally submitted on 16 07/10/12 and resubmitted herewith). 17 18 Dated: July 26, 2012 Kantor & Kantor, LLP 19 20 21 22 By: /s/ Beth A. Davis Beth A. Davis Attorneys for Plaintiff, Susan Carnahan 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Administrative Motion Requesting to File a Portion of Documents Under Seal and [Proposed] Order 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to Plaintiffs Administrative Motion Requesting to File a Portion of Certain 3 Documents Under Seal, those portions as shown by annotation in the documents, of Plaintiff’s 4 Responsive Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, Exhibit A to the Declaration of 5 Glenn R. Kantor in Support of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Claim Management 6 Guidelines pages ADMIN 000509, ADMIN 000512 and ADMIN 000513, Plaintiff’s Opening 7 Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (already filed with the Court as ECF 8 Document #24) and Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Objection to Plaintiff’s Extrinsic 9 Evidence Submitted with Her Motion for Judgment; Request to Strike, may be filed under seal. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California 91324 (818) 886 2525 12 13 DATED: 8/1/12 ___________________________ SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3Administrative Motion Requesting to File a Portion of Documents Under Seal and [Proposed] Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?