Carnahan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
53
STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 26 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings , 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 12/18/2012 01:00 AM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/18/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
GLENN R. KANTOR, Bar No. 122643
BETH A. DAVIS, Bar No. 277560
gkantor@kantorlaw.net
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California, 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818 350-6272
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUSAN CARNAHAN
SEDGWICK, LLP
REBECCA HULL Bar No. 99802
ERIN CORNELL Bar No. 227135
rebecca.hull@sedwicklaw.com
erin.cornell@sedgwicklaw.com
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 781-7900
Facsimile: (415) 781-2635
Attorneys for Defendant
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
SUSAN CARNAHAN,
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
22
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
CASE NO: CV 11-03064-SBA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S
MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT
1
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2012, plaintiff and defendant each filed a Motion for Judgment;
2
WHEREAS, on July 2, 2012, plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike the Declaration of Gregory
3
Hafner or in the alternative a Request to Reopen Discovery;
Whereas on July 23, 2012, the Court ordered that the hearing on the Motions for
4
5
Judgment be continued to October 23, 2012;
WHEREAS on July 25, 2012 the court referred plaintiff’s motion to the Chief Magistrate
6
7
Judge for a report and recommendation;
8
WHEREAS on September 28, 2012 Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins denied
9
plaintiff’s Motion to Strike but recommended the reopening of discovery for the limited purpose
10
of allowing plaintiff to depose Gregory Hafner in the next 30 days;
11
WHEREAS the court has not yet issued an order on the Recommendation; and
12
WHEREAS the parties have not yet been able to arrange a date for the deposition to take
13
14
place.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, subject to the
15
Court’s approval, the parties agree, and respectfully request, that the Court continue the hearing
16
date on both plaintiff’s and defendant’s Motions for Judgment from October 23, 2012 to
17
December 14, 2012, or such other date as the Court might order.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT
1
DATED: October 17, 2012
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
2
By: /s/ Glenn R. Kantor
Glenn R. Kantor
Beth A. Davis
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUSAN CARNAHAN
3
4
5
6
DATED: October 17, 2012
SEDGWICK LLP
7
8
9
10
By: /s/ Rebecca Hull
Rebecca Hull
Erin Cornell
Attorneys for Defendant
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT
1
ORDER
2
Having considered the stipulation filed by the parties on 10/17/12, and good cause
3
4
5
appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Motions for
Judgment currently set for October 23, 2012 is rescheduled to December 18 , 2012, at 1:00 p.m..
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED
8
9
10
DATE: 10/18/12
_____________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?