Tucker et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al

Filing 155

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 154 Stipulation filed by Gregory K. Tucker, Rebecca Tucker, Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/12/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2013)

Download PDF
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiffs GREGORY K. TUCKER and REBECCA TUCKER Daniel J. Herling (SBN 103711) Michelle Gillette (SBN178734) Howard I. Miller (SBN 251878) MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C. 44 Montgomery Street, 36th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415-432-6000 Facsimile: 415-432-6001 mgillette@mintz.com Michael V. Kell (pro hac vice) Michael O. Fawaz (pro hac vice) HOWARD & HOWARD 450 West Fourth Street Royal Oak, MI 48067-2557 Telephone: 248.723.0480 Facsimile: 248.645.1568 MKell@howardandhoward.com MFawaz@howardandhoward.com Attorneys for Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION 20 21 GREGORY K. TUCKER and REBECCA TUCKER, Case No. 4:11-cv-03086 YGR STIPULATION TO DISMISS 22 Plaintiffs, 24 WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP, INC., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. NO 27 RT 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 4:11-CV-03086-YGR ER onzalez R 6/12/2013 H 1 onne G Judge Yv N D IS T IC T R o ge r s LI 26 Hearing Date: May 17, 2013 Time: 9:00 a.m. D RDERE IS SO O IT A 25 UNIT ED S vs. RT U O 23 S DISTRICT TE C Action Filed: May 6, 2011 TA R NIA 2 Joseph H. Fagundes, Esq. #95264 Thomas M. Gray, Esq. #265212 MALM FAGUNDES LLP 6 El Dorado South, Suite 315 Stockton, CA 95202 Telephone: (209) 870-7900 Fax: (209) 870-7922 FO 1 OF C 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties through their respective counsel, that the entire 2 action brought by the Plaintiffs GREGORY K. TUCKER and REBECCA TUCKER, shall be dismissed 3 with prejudice due to the parties reaching a settlement. This dismissal is made pursuant to the Federal 4 Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a). 5 6 7 DATED: June 7, 2013 MALM FAGUNDES LLP 8 9 By: /s/ Thomas M. Gray Joseph H. Fagundes Thomas M. Gray Attorneys for Plaintiffs GREGORY K. TUCKER and REBECCA TUCKER 10 11 12 13 DATED: June 7, 2013 MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C. 14 By: 15 16 17 /s/ Michelle Gillette Michelle Gillette Howard Miller Daniel Herling HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 18 By: ______________________________ Michael O. Fawaz (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 4:11-CV-03086-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?