Sooalo v. Tews et al
Filing
10
ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO PROVIDE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/13/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
8
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ORDER FOR PETITIONER
TO PROVIDE STATEMENT
Petitioner,
v.
RANDY TEWS, Warden, and HARLEY
LAPPIN, BOP Director,
Respondents.
9
10
No. C 11-03124 YGR (PR)
ANALOSA SOOALO,
/
This is a habeas case filed by a federal prisoner. She was confined at Camp Parks, a federal
correctional facility in this district, at the time she filed the petition. She contends in the petition that
her rights were violated by the Bureau of Prison’s refusal to shorten her term of confinement as a
benefit for her participation in the Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program (RDAP). See 18
U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2)(B) (sentences of successful participants in RDAP program may be reduced by
up to one year). The Court issued an order to show cause why the petition should not be granted.
Respondents have filed an answer and a memorandum of points and authorities in support of it.
Petitioner has not filed an optional traverse.
Respondents say in their answer that Petitioner was due to be transferred to communitybased care in April of 2012. Petitioner has not provided a new address. If she has been assigned to
community care, she may not intend to pursue this case. Petitioner therefore is ORDERED to file a
brief statement saying whether she wishes to continue with the case. The case will be dismissed
without prejudice for failure to prosecute if she does not respond within thirty days or responds that
she does not wish to continue with the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 13, 2012
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
26
27
28
G:\YGRALL\ECF-Ready\Sooalo3124.osc-P.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?