Sooalo v. Tews et al

Filing 10

ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO PROVIDE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/13/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO PROVIDE STATEMENT Petitioner, v. RANDY TEWS, Warden, and HARLEY LAPPIN, BOP Director, Respondents. 9 10 No. C 11-03124 YGR (PR) ANALOSA SOOALO, / This is a habeas case filed by a federal prisoner. She was confined at Camp Parks, a federal correctional facility in this district, at the time she filed the petition. She contends in the petition that her rights were violated by the Bureau of Prison’s refusal to shorten her term of confinement as a benefit for her participation in the Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program (RDAP). See 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2)(B) (sentences of successful participants in RDAP program may be reduced by up to one year). The Court issued an order to show cause why the petition should not be granted. Respondents have filed an answer and a memorandum of points and authorities in support of it. Petitioner has not filed an optional traverse. Respondents say in their answer that Petitioner was due to be transferred to communitybased care in April of 2012. Petitioner has not provided a new address. If she has been assigned to community care, she may not intend to pursue this case. Petitioner therefore is ORDERED to file a brief statement saying whether she wishes to continue with the case. The case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute if she does not respond within thirty days or responds that she does not wish to continue with the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 13, 2012 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 G:\YGRALL\ECF-Ready\Sooalo3124.osc-P.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?