U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
Filing
86
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 68 Motion for Sanctions (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2013)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
and
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS AGAINST THIRD PARTY,
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC
RELATIONS, CALIFORNIA
UMME-HANI KHAN,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
10
11
Case No.: 11-cv-03162-YGR
vs.
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC.
d/b/a HOLLISTER CO., HOLLISTER CO.
CALIFORNIA, LLC,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Defendants have filed a Motion for Sanctions Against Third Party, Council on IslamicRelations, California, For Its Failure to Provide a 30(b)(6) Representative for Deposition (“Motion”).
(Dkt. No. 68.) Third-Party Council on American-Islamic Relations, California (“CAIR”) opposes and
requests sanctions against Defendants because the Motion was brought without substantial
justification. (Dkt. No. 70.) Having carefully considered the papers submitted and the pleadings in
this action, the arguments of counsel, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES
Defendants’ Motion and DENIES CAIR’s request for sanctions.
This Order terminates Dkt. No. 68.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: February 19, 2013
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?