Frisco v. Midland Credit Management Inc.

Filing 48

ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S LETTER FOR LEAVE TO FILE RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/15/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
3
4
5

LOUISE FRISCO,
6

Plaintiff,
7

vs.

Case No.: C-11-03284-YGR
ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT’S LETTER FOR LEAVE TO FILE
RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

8

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.,
9

Defendant.
10
11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

On May 8, 2012, Plaintiff filed a letter with the Court pursuant to its Standing Order in Civil

13

Cases seeking leave to file a renewed motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 47.) To date,

14

Plaintiff has failed to respond despite the Standing Order’s requirement that a response be filed within

15

three (3) business days. If no response is filed by Wednesday, May 16, 2012 at 2:00 p.m., the Court

16

will interpret the failure to respond as an admission of good cause for the filing of Defendant’s

17

summary judgment motion.

18

Depending upon whether Plaintiff files a response, the Court may set a date and time for a

19

conference at a future time.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: May 15, 2012

________________________________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE