Ortiz v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 19

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 17 Motion to Amend/Correct; Plaintiff is required to E-FILE the amended document.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
BENJAMIN ORTIZ,

12
13

Plaintiff(s),
v.

14

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
THE PLEADINGS

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

15

No. C-11-03317-DMR

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

Plaintiff Benjamin Ortiz moves pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rule of Civil

18

Procedure to amend his complaint. [Docket No. 17.] Defendants City and County of San Francisco

19

do not oppose the motion. [Docket No. 18.] Rule 15 instructs that the court “‘should freely give

20

leave [to amend] when justice so requires.’” Sullivan v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, Inc.,

21

No. C 11-02973 HRL, 2011 WL 5827220, at * 2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011) (brackets in original)

22

(quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2)). The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: December 14, 2011

27
28

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge