Johnson v. Alameda Court Superior Court
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Case Management Conference Statement. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S
REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT
WILLIAM KNIPP, Acting Warden,
No. C 11-03349 YGR (PR)
Petitioner filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
Thereafter, this action was reassigned to the undersigned judge. The Court ordered the parties to file
separate Case Management Conference Statements, which is appropriate in the instant action
because Petitioner is proceeding without counsel. To date, Petitioner has not filed his Case
Management Conference Statement. Instead, Petitioner has filed a request for an extension of time
to file his Case Management Conference Statement. Having read and considered Petitioner's
request, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for an extension of time is GRANTED.
The time in which Petitioner may file his Case Management Conference Statement will be extended
up to and including thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.
The Court further notes that because this is a habeas corpus action, the parties need not
submit the requested documents (in a 2'' or 3'' 3-ring black binder) outlined in subsection D of the
William Knipp, the current acting warden of the prison where Petitioner is incarcerated, has
been substituted as Respondent pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This Order terminates Docket no. 9.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 9, 2012
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?