Montgomery v. Republic Services, Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ORDERING STIPULATION 27 . Signed by Judge Beeler on 12/22/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION 10 RONALD MONTGOMERY, CASE NO. 11-cv-03390 LB 11 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; AND DOES 1-10, 14 inclusive, 15 Defendants. Courtroom: Magistrate Judge: Trial Date: 4 Laurel Beeler Not set 16 17 18 Having read and considered the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, 19 submitted by Plaintiff Ronald Montgomery (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorney of record, 20 Richard J. Meechan of the Law Office of Richard J. Meechan, and Defendant Browning-Ferris 21 Industries of California, Inc., (“Defendant”), by and through its attorney of record, J. Rod Betts 22 and Angela T. Mullins of Paul, Plevin, Sullivan & Connaughton, LLP’s, the Court hereby orders 23 the following: 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 11-cv-03390 LB 1 1. All legal claims and allegations made by Plaintiff against Defendant in the civil 2 action, Case No.: 11-cv-03390LB, is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 3 2. Each party waives and releases the other for any claims for attorneys’ fees and 4 costs in connection with this matter. S Dated: December 22 , 2011 By: 8 UNIT ED ERED O ORD BEELER HONORABLE LAUREL IT IS S United States Magistrate Judge l Beeler NO RT ER H 11 aure Judge L 12 FO 10 LI 9 A 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: R NIA 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2 11-cv-03390 LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?