Hurst v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on December 2, 2011. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 ANDRE HURST, an individual doing business as THE PEGASUS GROUP, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Plaintiff, 7 8 No. C 11-3424 CW v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK, INC., Defendant. ________________________________/ 12 13 On November 21, 2011, the Court warned Plaintiff that failure 14 to serve Defendant with a summons and the complaint, pursuant to 15 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), would result in dismissal of 16 this action for failure to prosecute. 17 Plaintiff to serve Defendant or submit a request for an extension 18 of time for service, on or before December 1, 2011, or face 19 dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to 20 prosecute. 21 served Defendant. 22 prejudice for failure to prosecute. 23 The Court required Plaintiff has provided no indication that he has Accordingly, this action is dismissed without IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 2, 2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?