Hurst v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on December 2, 2011. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANDRE HURST, an individual doing
business as THE PEGASUS GROUP,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 11-3424 CW
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, as receiver for
UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK, INC.,
On November 21, 2011, the Court warned Plaintiff that failure
to serve Defendant with a summons and the complaint, pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), would result in dismissal of
this action for failure to prosecute.
Plaintiff to serve Defendant or submit a request for an extension
of time for service, on or before December 1, 2011, or face
dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to
prejudice for failure to prosecute.
The Court required
Plaintiff has provided no indication that he has
Accordingly, this action is dismissed without
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 2, 2011
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?