Jones et al v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 44

ORDER RE: SECOND CONTINUANCE OF COMPLIANCE HEARING FOR FILING OF AMENDED PETITION FOR MINOR'S COMPROMISE. The 10/11/2013 Compliance Hearing is CONTINUED TO Friday, October 25, 2013 at 9:01 AM.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/10/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 9 NELLIE JONES, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Case No.: 11-CV-3470-YGR ORDER RE: SECOND CONTINUANCE OF COMPLIANCE HEARING FOR FILING OF AMENDED PETITION FOR MINOR’S COMPROMISE Defendants. 10 The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal the Second 11 Amended Petition to Appoint GAL and Compromise Minor’s Claim. (Dkt. No. 42.) While Plaintiffs Northern District of California United States District Court 12 have addressed some of the Court’s concerns as detailed in the Court’s Order of September 25, 2013, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 the Petition is still missing a breakdown of the costs and expenses represented by the $8,000 figure cited in the Petition. The compliance hearing currently set for Friday, October 11, 2013, is CONTINUED to October 25, 2013, on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 5. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the continued compliance hearing, Plaintiffs shall 20 file a supplemental declaration detailing the actual costs incurred and providing evidence of any 21 agreement regarding division of those costs between Plaintiffs. If compliance is satisfactory, 22 Plaintiffs need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic 23 appearances may be allowed if the parties have submitted a written statement in a timely fashion. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 10, 2013 ____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?