Allstate Insurance Company v. Pira et al

Filing 87

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS SEPARATE ( 83 , 85 ) BRIEFS AND RESETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Responses / Cross Motions due by 1/28/2013; Replies due by 2/4/2013; Replies due by 2/11/2013. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/25/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2013)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an
Illinois Corporation,

6

Plaintiff,

7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of
California

10

No. C 11-3511 CW

v.
ANDREW PIRA, RICHARD PIRA, and
ALEXANDER YIN,
Defendants.
________________________________/

ORDER STRIKING
DEFENDANT’S
SEPARATE BRIEFS
(Docket Nos. 83
and 85) AND
RESETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON
CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
AND CROSS-CLAIMS
________________________________/
On May 10, 2012, the Court held a case management conference
and, among other things, set a briefing schedule for the parties’
cross-motions for summary judgment.

Pursuant to that schedule,

Defendant Alexander Yin was required to file his opposition to
Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment
and his cross-motion for summary judgment “contained in a single
brief.”

Docket No. 55.

The parties subsequently stipulated to continue the briefing
schedule, with Court approval.

See Docket Nos. 59, 60, 62, 63.

Under the modified schedule, Defendant was required to file his
opposition and cross-motion by January 24, 2013.

Docket No. 63.

Plaintiff was required to file its reply in support of its motion
and opposition to Defendant’s cross-motion, contained in a single
brief, by January 31, 2013.

Id.

1

On January 25, 2013, one day after its filing deadline,

2

Defendant filed two separate briefs: an opposition to Plaintiff’s

3

motion for summary judgment and a separate cross-motion for

4

summary judgment.

Docket Nos. 83 and 85.

5

The Court STRIKES the separate briefs filed by Defendant

6

(Docket Ns. 83 and 85) and RESETS the briefing schedule on the

7

cross-motions for summary judgment as follows:

8

file a single brief, of twenty-five pages or less, containing its

9

opposition and cross-motion, by Monday, January 28, 2013.

Defendant shall

United States District Court
For the Northern District of
California

10

Plaintiff shall file its reply and opposition to Defendant’s

11

cross-motion, contained in a single brief of fifteen pages or

12

less, by Monday, February 4, 2013.

13

in support of its cross-motion, in a brief of fifteen pages or

14

less, by Monday, February 11, 2013.

15

management conference currently for March 7, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. are

16

maintained.

17

Defendant shall file its reply

The hearing and further case

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

Dated:

1/25/2013

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2