Oracle Corporation et al v. ORG Structure Innovations LLC et al
Filing
114
STIPULATION AND ORDER re (80 in 4:12-cv-00348-SBA, 80 in 4:12-cv-00348-SBA) Stipulation and Order, Case Referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/11/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
K.T. Cherian (Cal. Bar No. 133967)
Clayton C. James (admitted pro hac vice)
Srecko Vidmar (Cal. Bar No. 241120)
Maren J. Clouse (Cal. Bar No. 228726)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 374-2300
Facsimile: (415) 374-2499
Peter J. O’Rourke (Cal. Bar No. 227164)
ORACLE CORPORATION
500 Oracle Parkway, MS 5OP7
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 506-5200
Facsimile: (650) 506-7114
9
10
Attorneys for
ORACLE CORPORATION
and ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16
ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, and ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a
Delaware corporation,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
Case No. 11-cv-03549-SBA
SECOND REVISED STIPULATION
AND ORDER SELECTING ADR
PROCESS
v.
ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC, a
Texas limited liability company, and PAUL
MORINVILLE, an individual resident of
Indiana,
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND REVISED STIP. AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. 11-cv-03549-SBA
1
Case No. 12-cv-00297-SBA
PAUL V. MORINVILLE and ORG
STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC,
2
Plaintiffs,
3
v.
4
5
ORACLE CORPORATION and ORACLE
AMERICA, INC.,
6
Defendants.
7
8
9
10
Case No. 12-cv-00348-SBA
ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
ORACLE CORPORATION
AMERICA, INC.,
15
and
ORACLE
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
SECOND REVISED STIP. AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. 11-cv-03549-SBA
1
2
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5:
3
The parties have previously agreed to private mediation and previously informed the Court
4
that they planned to hold the mediation with mediator Edward A. Infante, United States Magistrate
5
Judge (Ret.), of JAMS on June 6, 2012. The Court signed the parties’ stipulated order to that effect
6
on March 27, 2012 (Dkt. No. 100). Oracle has become aware of a conflict with respect to use of
7
Judge Infante. The parties have agreed to reschedule the mediation with mediator Randall W.
8
Wulff, Esq. of Wulff Quinby Sochynsky, who can mediate the case in late August. The parties
9
attach a proposed Order setting forth their agreed upon mediation provider and the date by which
10
mediation shall be completed.
11
12
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
13
Dated: May 10, 2012
14
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
By: /s/ Maren J. Clouse
Maren J. Clouse
15
Attorneys for
ORACLE CORPORATION
and ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Dated: May 10, 2012
FARNEY DANIELS LLP
By: /s/ Steven R. Daniels
Steven R. Daniels
800 South Austin Avenue, Suite 200
Georgetown, Texas 78626
Attorneys for
ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC
and PAUL MORINVILLE
I, Maren J. Clouse, attest that Steven R. Daniels has read and approved this Stipulation and
Proposed Order Selecting ADR Process and consents to its filing in this action.
27
28
1
SECOND REVISED STIP. AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. 11-cv-03549-SBA
1
2
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is referred to private
3
mediation. The parties agree to hold the mediation by no later than August 31, 2012 with Randall
4
W. Wulff, Esq. of Wulff Quinby Sochynsky.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED: _5/11/12
8
____________________________________________
9
THE HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
10
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
SECOND REVISED STIP. AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. 11-cv-03549-SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?