Oracle Corporation et al v. ORG Structure Innovations LLC et al

Filing 116

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting (115) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 4:11-cv-03549-SBA; granting (47) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 4:12-cv-00297-SBA; granting (92) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 4:12-cv-00348-SBA (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 K.T. Cherian (Cal. Bar No. 133967) Clayton C. James (admitted pro hac vice) Srecko Vidmar (Cal. Bar No. 241120) Maren J. Clouse (Cal. Bar No. 228726) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 374-2300 Facsimile: (415) 374-2499 Peter J. O’Rourke (Cal. Bar No. 227164) ORACLE CORPORATION 500 Oracle Parkway, MS 5OP7 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 506-5200 Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ORACLE CORPORATION and ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 17 Plaintiffs, 18 19 20 v. ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC, a Texas limited liability company, and PAUL MORINVILLE, an individual resident of Indiana, 21 Case No. 11-cv-03549-SBA STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 26(f) Date: July 24, 2012 Time: 1:00 p.m. Courtroom: 1, 4th Floor Defendants. 22 Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL; CASE NOS. 11-cv-03549-SBA, 12-cv-00297-SBA; 12-cv-00348-SBA 1 PAUL V. MORINVILLE and ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC, Case No. 12-cv-00297-SBA 2 Plaintiffs, 3 v. 4 5 ORACLE CORPORATION and ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 6 Defendants. 7 8 ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC, 9 10 11 Case No. 12-cv-00348-SBA Plaintiff, v. ORACLE CORPORATION and ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL; CASE NOS. 11-cv-03549-SBA, 12-cv-00297-SBA; 12-cv-00348-SBA 1 2 3 4 5 WHEREAS Defendant Morinville filed an Administrative Motion to Seal the Complaint in this action on the grounds that it contains confidential information (Dkt. No. 7); WHEREAS the Court issued an Order granting Defendant’s Motion to Seal the Complaint and directing that the Complaint be filed under seal (Dkt. No. 10); WHEREAS Plaintiffs do not believe that the Complaint contains any information 6 appropriate for filing under seal and have moved the Court for reconsideration of its Order sealing 7 the Complaint (Dkt. No. 39); 8 WHEREAS Defendants believe that the Complaint does contain confidential information 9 that should be sealed, and that quotations or discussions of that confidential information in other 10 11 12 13 pleadings also should be sealed; WHEREAS portions of the parties’ Joint Case Management Conference Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) refer to the Complaint; WHEREAS in light of the Court’s Order sealing the Complaint, the parties seek to file under 14 seal those portions of their Joint Case Management Conference Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule 15 of Civil Procedure 26(f) that refer to the Complaint; 16 17 WHEREAS this action concerns a patent license agreement (“Agreement”) that contains confidential business information and is subject to a confidentiality agreement; 18 WHEREAS that Agreement has been filed under seal in this action (Dkt. No. 43 Ex. 2); 19 WHEREAS portions of the parties’ Joint Case Management Conference Statement Pursuant 20 21 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) refer to confidential information in the Agreement; and WHEREAS the parties seek to file under seal those portions of the Joint Case Management 22 Conference Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) that refer to confidential 23 information the Agreement; 24 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that, with the Court’s 25 permission, the parties may file under seal in accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 those portions 26 of their Joint Case Management Conference Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27 26(f) that refer to the Complaint or confidential information in the Agreement. 28 1 STIP. AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL; CASE NOS. 11-cv-03549-SBA, 12-cv-00297-SBA; 12-cv-00348-SBA 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 2 3 Dated: June 21, 2012 4 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP By: /s/ Maren J. Clouse Maren J. Clouse 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ORACLE CORPORATION and ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dated: June 21, 2012 FARNEY DANIELS LLP By: /s/ Steven R. Daniels Steven R. Daniels 800 South Austin Avenue, Suite 200 Georgetown, Texas 78626 Attorneys for Defendants ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC and PAUL MORINVILLE 15 16 17 I, Maren J. Clouse, attest that Steven R. Daniels has read and approved this Stipulation and Proposed Order Granting Joint Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and consents to its filing in this action. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIP. AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL; CASE NOS. 11-cv-03549-SBA, 12-cv-00297-SBA; 12-cv-00348-SBA 1 ORDER 2 3 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties may file under seal in 4 accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 those portions of their Joint Case Management Conference 5 Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) that refer to the Complaint or 6 confidential information in the Agreement. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 DATED: _6/26/12 11 ____________________________________________ 12 THE HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIP. AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL; CASE NOS. 11-cv-03549-SBA, 12-cv-00297-SBA; 12-cv-00348-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?