Missud v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 49

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 1/3/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/22/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)

1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
PATRICK A MISSUD,

No. C-11-03567 (DMR)

8
Plaintiff(s),

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9
v.
NEVADA STATE OF,
11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

13
Plaintiff Patrick Missud filed this action on July 20, 2011. To date, he has not properly
14
served Defendants State of Nevada; Susan Eckhardt; David Sarnowski; Nevada State Bar;
15
Constance Akridge; Nevada Supreme Court; Eighth Judicial District Court of County of Clark;
16
Special Magistrate Curtis Coltrane of Beaufort County, South Carolina; Court Clerk Steven Grierson
17
and Judge Elizabeth Gonzales of the Clark County Courts of Nevada; Discovery Commissioner
18
Bonnie Bulla of Nevada’s Eighth Judicial District Court; Chief Justice Nancy M. Saiita and Justices
19
Michael L. Douglas, James W. Hardesty, Kristina Pickering, Mark Gibbons, Michael Cherry, and
20
Ron Parraguirre of the Supreme Court of Nevada; San Francisco Superior Court Judges Charlotte
21
Woolard and Loretta Giorgi; Judge Saundra Armstrong of the U.S. District Court for the Northern
22
District of California; Judge Roger Hunt of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada; and
23
Judge Roger Benitez of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. According to
24
Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[i]f a defendant is not served within 120 days
25
after the complaint is filed, the court--on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff--must
26
dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a
27
specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The 120-day deadline passed on November 17, 2011. The
28

1

court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff to Show Cause by January 3, 2012 why the court should not

2

dismiss the aforementioned Defendants.

6

Dated: December 22, 2011

8

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
E

H

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

RN

A

RT

NO

M. Ryu

7

onna
Judge D

R NIA

5

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LI

S
UNIT
ED

4

RT
U
O

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C