Perez et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al

Filing 35

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on July 5, 2012. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 AMELIA PEREZ, An Individual; CONSTANTINO PEREZ JR, An Individual, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, v. No. C 11-3602 CW ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, a National Association F/K/A WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation; and LASALLE BANK, NA; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. ________________________________/ In this action, Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., an acquirer of certain assets and liabilities of Washington Mutual Bank from the FDIC acting as receiver, erroneously sued as JPMorgan Chase Bank, a National Association F/K/A Washington Mutual Bank; California Reconveyance Company; and Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to LaSalle Bank N.A., as trustee for WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-OA1, erroneously sued as LaSalle Bank N.A., moved to dismiss without 1 leave to amend Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. 2 are scheduled for an ADR session at 3:00 pm on July 10, 2012. 3 Thus far, Plaintiffs have not opposed Defendants’ motion to 4 dismiss. 5 before July 17, 2012, or face dismissal of their case for failure 6 to prosecute. 7 The parties Plaintiffs shall file a response to the motion on or The July 19, 2012 hearing on the motion is vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Dated: CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?