Cuauhtemoc Meneses v. U-Haul International, Inc. et al

Filing 80

ORDER, Motions terminated: 77 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by Cuauhtemoc Meneses. Motions due by 6/22/2012. Replies due by 7/30/2012. Responses due by 7/16/2012. Motion Hearing set for 9/27/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 5/18/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CUAUHTEMOC MENESES, No. C-11-03615 DMR 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 v. ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, 11 12 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 13 The court is in receipt of the parties’ joint case management statement of May 18, 2012. 14 [Docket No. 79.] The court hereby VACATES the May 23, 2012 case management conference and 15 denies Plaintiff’s motion to appear by telephone [Docket No. 77] as moot. The court also ORDERS 16 that the parties comply with the following briefing schedule for formal resolution of Plaintiff’s 17 claims pursuant to the Richard settlement: 18 • Plaintiff’s opening papers are due no later than June 22, 2012; • Defendants shall submit their opposition papers no later than July 16, 2012; and • Plaintiff’s reply papers are due no later than July 30, 2012. 19 20 21 The court will hold a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion on September 27, 2012 at 11:00 a.m., 22 Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612. 24 u S RT onn Judge D H ER FO a M. Ry NO 28 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge LI 27 D RDERE OO IT IS S A Dated: May 18, 2012 26 RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 S DISTRICT TE C TA N R NIA 23 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?