Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION AND REMANDING CASE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/19/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2011)

ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ., S.B. #73685
DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., S.B. #I54436
RICHARD M. GRANT, ESQ., S.B. #55677
BRAYTON*:*PURCELL LLP
222 Rush Landing Road
PO Box 6169
Novato, California 94948-6 169
[phone]
(4 15) 898- 1247 Fax

I

6 Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES E. OWENS,
Plaintiff,

)

j
)

ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION, et )
a1.,
)
Defendants.

No. CV- 11-3618 PJH

1

)

VS.

I

DEFENDANT LOCKHEED MARTIN
CORPORATION AND REMAND CASE
TO CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT

AND ORDER REMANDING CASE

)

Come now Plaintiff JAMES E. OWENS ("Plaintiff') and Defendant LOCKHEED
MARTIN CORPORATION ("Lockheed"), who file the following joint stipulation pursuant to
Local Rules 7- 1 and 7- 12:
WHEREAS, Defendant Lockheed removed this case to the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California on July 22,201 1, on the ground that'the Court has
"federal officer" subject matter jurisdiction under 28 United States Code 5 1442(a)(l); and
WHEREAS, Defendant Lockheed was the sole removing defendant and no other
25
defendant joined in removal or filed a separate notice of removal; and
26

WHEREAS, Plaintiff andDefendant Lockheed, the affected parties, have now agreed

27
that Plaintiff will dismiss Lockheed from this action with prejudice; and
28

11
I.

WHEREAS, Defendant Lockheed's desire for a federal forum for this actionis now
1
ATTY R M O W E N S L a k h d mat atlp rc~n.mdwpd

STIPULATION T O DISMISS DEFENDANT LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION AND REMAND CASE
T O CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT; C V - 1 1-36 18 PJH

I

moot given the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs claims against it; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to this resolution of the parties, Plaintiff and Defendant Lockheed
seek to have this action remanded to state court;
IT IS HEREBY STLPULATED by the affected parties, Plaintiff and Defendant
Lockheed, that the claims against Defendant Lockheed shall be, and hereby are, dismissed with
prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and that this action shall
be immediately remanded to the San Francisco County Superior Court, Case No. CGC-09275341, the court in which it was originally filed and from which it was removed.
201
DATED: August /l, 1

BRAYTON*:*PURCELLLLP

Attorneys for plaintiff
DATED: ~ u ~ u s t L 6 , 2 0 1 1

KNOTT & GLbZfiR LLP,
By:
Attornevs for Defendant

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant Lockheed Martin
Corporation is dismissed with prejudice and this case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of
California, County of San Francisco, Case. No. CGC-09-27534 1. The Clerk shall send a
certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Court for the Superior Court of California,
i

County of San Francisco.
Dated: 8/19/11

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T HAMILTON
PHYLLIS J.

RT

2

R NIA

amilton

H
hyllis J.
Judge P

FO

NO

L.'ATTYRMG:OWENS LuckhccJ.mut.~tipmmmd.wpd

ERED

O ORD

IT IS S

LI

UNIT
ED

S

RT
U
O

HON.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

A

H

ER
STIPULATION TO DISMISS D E F E N D A N T LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION A N D R E M A N D C A S E
C
TO CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT; C V - 11-3618 PJH
N
F

D IS T IC T O
R

James E. Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., et al.
CV-1
1-3618 PJH

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the following with the Clerk of the Court for
the United States District Court by using the CMIECF system on August 16, 201 11.
STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT LOCKHEED MARTIN
CORPORATION AND REMAND CASE TO CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT
Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CMJECF
system.

I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CMIECF
users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail.
SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST

1 Dated this

16

, day of August

,2011.
IS/ Jane Ehni

.

Brayton-Purcell Service List
Date C r e a t e d : 8/16/2011-4:47:35
P
M
C r e a t e d by: L i t s u p p o r t - S e r v i c e L i s t - R e p o r t i n g
M a t t e r Number: 2 3 4 0 8 . 0 0 1 - J a m e s Owens

1
Run By : E h n i , J a n e (JAE)

Berr & Berry
P.O. ox 16070
2930 Lakeshore Avenue
Oakland, CA 946 10
510-835-8330. 510-835-51 17 (fax)
Defendants:
Berry & Beny (B&B)

Cha man & Intrieri, L.L.P.
223tIvlariner Square Drive
Third Floor, Suite 300
Alameda, CA 9540 1
5 10-864-3600 5 10-864-3601 (fax)
Defendants:
Henkel Corporation (HENKEL)

Herr & Zapala, LLP
152 North 3rdStreet, Suite 500
San Jose, CA 95 112
408-287-7788 408-927-0408 (fax)
Defendants:
Epoxylite Corporation, The (EPOXY)

Knott & Glazier. LLP
707 Willshire ~ l v d .
Suite 2025
Los Angeles, CA 900 17
2 13-3 12-9200 2 13-3 12-920 1 (fax)
Defendants:
Lockheed Martin Corporation (LOCCOR)

Nixon Peabodv LLP
One ~mbarcadiro
18" Floor
San Francisco, CA 941 11
415-984-8200 866-542-6538 (fax)
Defendants:
Shell Oil Company (SHLOIL)

Pond North, LLP
350 South Grand Avenue
Suite 3300
Los Angeles, CA 9007 1
213-617-61 70 213-623-3594 (fax)
Defendants:
CBS Corporation (fka Viacom Inc., fka
Westinghouse Electric Corporation)
(VIACOM)

Schiff Hardin LLP
One Market Plaza
Spear Street Tower, 3Td Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
41 5-90 1-8700 4 15-90 1-8701 (fax)
Defendants:
Owens-Illinois, Inc. (01)

Walsworth, Franklin, Bevins & McCall
60 1 Montgomery Street, 9IhFloor
San Francisco, CA 941 11
415-78 1-7072 415-391-6258 (fax)
Defendants:
Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. (CLEAVR)
Thomas Dee Engineering Company (DEE)

r;