The Regents of the University of California v. Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service, Inc.

Filing 28

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Beeler on 1/13/2012. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA,

CASE NO. 4:11-cv-03622 LB

Plaintiff(s),
v.
BLUE CROSS OF IDAHO HEALTH
SERVICE, INC., et al.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Ralph Williams, Esq. of
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
✔
ADR Mediation Services

_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
✔
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dec. 29, 2011
Dated:___________

/s/ Celim Huezo, Esq.
____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dec. 29, 2011
Dated:____________

/s/ Eric C. Schaffer, Esq.
____________________________
Attorney for Defendant

CV 11-3622 LB
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
9
Non-binding Arbitration
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
9
Mediation
9
Private ADR
✔

UNIT
ED

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

___________________________________
Honorable Laurel Beeler
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
r
el Beele
ge Laur
Jud

CV 11-3622 LB
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

A

H

ER

LI

RT

FO

NO

R NIA

January 13, 2012
Dated:________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

Deadline for ADR session
✔
9
90 days from the date of this order.
9
other ___________________

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C