The Regents of the University of California v. Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service, Inc.

Filing 28

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Beeler on 1/13/2012. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 4:11-cv-03622 LB Plaintiff(s), v. BLUE CROSS OF IDAHO HEALTH SERVICE, INC., et al. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Ralph Williams, Esq. of 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ ✔ ADR Mediation Services _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order ✔ referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dec. 29, 2011 Dated:___________ /s/ Celim Huezo, Esq. ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff Dec. 29, 2011 Dated:____________ /s/ Eric C. Schaffer, Esq. ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant CV 11-3622 LB STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR ✔ UNIT ED DERED O OR IT IS S ___________________________________ Honorable Laurel Beeler UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE r el Beele ge Laur Jud CV 11-3622 LB STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS A H ER LI RT FO NO R NIA January 13, 2012 Dated:________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. S Deadline for ADR session ✔ 9 90 days from the date of this order. 9 other ___________________ N D IS T IC T R OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?