Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, VACATING OCTOBER 27, 2011 HEARING AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/20/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
JAIME RODRIGUEZ,
5
6
7
8
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and FIRST
AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING
SOLUTIONS, LLC,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
No. C 11-03654 CW
Defendants.
________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF'S
APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS, VACATING
OCTOBER 27, 2011
HEARING AND
SETTING DEADLINE
FOR RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION
TO DISMISS
11
12
Plaintiff Jaime Rodriguez's application to proceed in forma
13
pauperis is GRANTED.
14
Marshal for the Northern District of California shall serve,
15
without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any
16
amendments, scheduling orders, attachments, plaintiff's affidavit
17
The Clerk shall issue a summons.
The U.S.
and this order upon Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.1
18
19
Having reviewed Plaintiff's complaint, the Court finds that
20
this case would be appropriate for referral to the Court's
21
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit to assess this case's
22
suitability for mediation or a settlement conference.
23
assessment is made through a telephone conference with the
24
parties.
This
However, Wells Fargo has not yet been served.
The Court
25
26
1
27
28
Defendant First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC
has appeared in the case, having filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint. Docket No. 6.
1
will delay referring the case to the ADR Unit until Wells Fargo is
2
served.
3
The hearing set for October 27, 2011, on First American
4
Trustee's pending motion to dismiss, is VACATED.
5
yet to oppose the motion.
6
Plaintiff has
Plaintiff shall submit his response
within fourteen days after the date the ADR telephone conference
7
is held.
If Plaintiff fails to do so, the motion will be granted
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
for lack of opposition.
The Court will consider the motion on the
papers.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: 10/20/2011
14
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
15
16
cc: ADR
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?