Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 15

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, VACATING OCTOBER 27, 2011 HEARING AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/20/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JAIME RODRIGUEZ, 5 6 7 8 Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING SOLUTIONS, LLC, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 No. C 11-03654 CW Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, VACATING OCTOBER 27, 2011 HEARING AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 11 12 Plaintiff Jaime Rodriguez's application to proceed in forma 13 pauperis is GRANTED. 14 Marshal for the Northern District of California shall serve, 15 without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any 16 amendments, scheduling orders, attachments, plaintiff's affidavit 17 The Clerk shall issue a summons. The U.S. and this order upon Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.1 18 19 Having reviewed Plaintiff's complaint, the Court finds that 20 this case would be appropriate for referral to the Court's 21 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit to assess this case's 22 suitability for mediation or a settlement conference. 23 assessment is made through a telephone conference with the 24 parties. This However, Wells Fargo has not yet been served. The Court 25 26 1 27 28 Defendant First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC has appeared in the case, having filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. Docket No. 6. 1 will delay referring the case to the ADR Unit until Wells Fargo is 2 served. 3 The hearing set for October 27, 2011, on First American 4 Trustee's pending motion to dismiss, is VACATED. 5 yet to oppose the motion. 6 Plaintiff has Plaintiff shall submit his response within fourteen days after the date the ADR telephone conference 7 is held. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the motion will be granted 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 for lack of opposition. The Court will consider the motion on the papers. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: 10/20/2011 14 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 15 16 cc: ADR 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?