Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 23

SCHEDULING ORDER. Responses due by 12/28/2011. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/15/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JAIME RODRIGUEZ, 5 6 7 8 Plaintiff, United States District Court For the Northern District of California SCHEDULING ORDER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING SOLUTIONS, LLC, 9 10 No. C 11-03654 CW Defendants. ________________________________/ 11 12 On October 20, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff Jaime 13 Rodriguez to respond to Defendant First American Trustee Servicing 14 Solutions, LLC's motion to dismiss within fourteen days after the 15 Alternative Dispute Resolution telephone conference. 16 the date for the ADR telephone conference had not been set. 17 At the time, The Court also stated that it would consider the motion on the papers. 18 On November 28, 2011, Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A. moved to 19 20 dismiss Plaintiff's claims. Docket No. 19. Pursuant to Civil 21 Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff's response was due December 12, 2011. 22 Plaintiff, thus far, has failed to oppose Wells Fargo's motion. 23 On December 14, 2011, the ADR unit convened its second 24 telephone conference after Plaintiff failed to appear for the 25 first one. Again, Plaintiff failed to appear. 26 As required by the Court's October 20, 2011 order, Plaintiff 27 shall respond to First American's motion to dismiss on or before 28 1 December 28, 2011, or his claims against First American will be 2 dismissed for failure to prosecute. 3 respond to Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss on or before December 4 28, 2011, or his claims against Wells Fargo will be dismissed for 5 failure to prosecute. 6 In addition, Plaintiff shall The Court will consider Wells Fargo's motion on the papers. 7 The January 12, 2012 hearing for Wells Fargo's motion is 8 9 VACATED. The January 11, 2012 case management conference is United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 VACATED, to be reset if necessary after the motions to dismiss are 11 decided. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 Dated: 12/15/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?