White v. Martel

Filing 6

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Motions terminated: 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Johnathan Cornielus White.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/21/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS STATUS AND DIRECTING
RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE
GRANTED

Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL MARTEL, Acting Warden,

15

Respondent.

16
17

No. C 11-03709 SBA (PR)

JONATHAN CORNIELUS WHITE,

/

Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

18

U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It does not appear from the

19

face of the petition that it is without merit. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby issues the

20

following orders:

21

1.

Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.

22

2.

The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order and the petition and all

23

attachments thereto upon Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State

24

of California. The Clerk shall also serve a copy of this Order on Petitioner at his current address.

25

3.

Respondent shall file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within one-hundred

26

and twenty (120) days of the issuance of this Order, an Answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5

27

of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not

28

be issued. Respondent shall file with the Answer a copy of all portions of the relevant state records

1

that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented

2

by the petition.

3

4.

If Petitioner wishes to respond to the Answer, he shall do so by filing a Traverse with

4

the Court and serving it on Respondent within sixty (60) days of his receipt of the Answer. Should

5

Petitioner fail to do so, the petition will be deemed submitted and ready for decision sixty (60) days

6

after the date Petitioner is served with Respondent's Answer.

7

5.

Respondent may file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty (60) days

forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If

10

Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on Respondent an

11
For the Northern District of California

of the issuance of this Order, a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an Answer, as set

9

United States District Court

8

opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion within sixty (60) days of receipt of the

12

motion, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen (15)

13

days of receipt of any opposition.

14

6.

It is Petitioner's responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner must keep the Court

15

and Respondent informed of any change of address and must comply with the Court's orders in a

16

timely fashion. Petitioner must also serve on Respondent's counsel all communications with the

17

Court by mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent's counsel.

18

7.

Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable extensions will be granted.

19

Any motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than ten (10) days prior to the deadline

20

sought to be extended.

21

8.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

DATED:

This Order terminates Docket no. 4.

10/21/11
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
2

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

JONATHAN CORNIELUS WHITE,
Case Number: CV11-03709 SBA
Plaintiff,

5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
MICHAEL MARTEL et al,
Defendant.

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on October 25, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.

13
14
15
16

Johnathan Cornielus White AE-0683
San Quentin State PRison
San Quentin, CA 94974

17

Dated: October 25, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

G:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.11\White3709.OSC.frm

3