Carson v. Verismart Software, Inc. et al

Filing 72

ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Beeler on 2/13/2012. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Northern District of California

10

Oakland Division
FLETCHER CARSON,

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

No. C 11-03766 LB

Plaintiff,

ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE

v.
13
VERISMART SOFTWARE, et al.,
14
15
16

Defendants.
_____________________________________/
On August 1, 2011, pro se Plaintiff Fletcher Carson filed his original complaint. ECF No. 1 at

17

1. On January 7, 2012, Carson filed a motion for a restraining order and an order to show cause why

18

a preliminary injunction should not issue against Defendants Verismart Software, Inc., Joe Dawson,

19

James Garvey, Carl Raff, Andy Thoren, and Phillip Thoren on Carson’s copyright infringement

20

claims. ECF No. 26 at 1. In the motion, Carson requested that the court hear the matter no later

21

than February 16, 2012, when some of the defendants had noticed a motion to dismiss. Id. at 3. The

22

court set a hearing for Carson’s motion on this date. The court subsequently reset the hearing on the

23

defendants’ motions to dismiss to March 15, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. ECF No. 66. Given the court’s

24

view that it would be most efficient to hear all of the pending matters on the same date, the court

25

now resets Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to March 15, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.

26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 13, 2012
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

28

C 11-03766 LB
ORDER