Trustees of the Northern California Tile Industry Pension Trust Fund et al v. Peacock Tile and Marble, Inc. et al

Filing 121

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT HOMESITE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 06/02/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014)

Download PDF
Case4:11-cv-03859-DMR Document120 Filed05/28/14 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DAVIS, COWELL & BOWE, LLP JOHN J. DAVIS, JR., SBN 65594 jjdavis@dcbsf.com SARAH GROSSMAN-SWENSON, SBN 259792 sgs@dcbsf.com ELIZABETH Q. HINCKLE, SBN 273553 eqh@dcbsf.com 595 Market Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel.: (415) 597-7200 Fax: (415) 597-7201 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TRUSTEES of the NORTHERN CALIFORNIA TILE INDUSTRY PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PEACOCK TILE AND MARBLE, INC., et al., Defendants. 21 22 23 24 ) Case No. CV 11-3859 DMR ) ) ) PLAINTIFFS’ DISMISSAL WITH ) PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT ) HOMESITE SERVICES, INC. ) ) and ) [proposed] ORDER ) ) [F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2)] ) ) ) Judge: Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu ) ) ) Location: Courtroom No. 4, 3rd Floor Oakland Courthouse ) ) 1301 Clay Street ) Oakland, CA 94612 ) / 25 26 27 28 Pls.’ Dismissal With Prejudice of Def. Homesite and [proposed] ORDER Case No. CV 11-3859 DMR Case4:11-cv-03859-DMR Document120 Filed05/28/14 Page2 of 2 1 PLAINTIFFS’ DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT HOMESITE SERVICES, INC. 2 3 Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 41(a)(2), and the Stipulation 4 approved by Court Order on May 23, 2014, at page 3, paragraph 3 [Dkt. No. 119, p. 3:5-6], 5 Plaintiffs Trustees of the Northern California Tile Industry Pension Trust Fund; Trustees of the 6 Northern California Tile Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund; Trustees of the Northern 7 California Tile Industry Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund; Trustees of the Northern 8 California Tile Industry Vacation and Holiday Trust Fund; and Trustees of the Northern California 9 Tile Industry Labor Management Cooperation Trust Fund (“Plaintiffs”) hereby dismiss with 10 prejudice Defendant Homesite Services, Inc. (“Homesite”), from the above-entitled action, as 11 Defendant has complied with paragraph III.A of the Parties’ Settlement Agreement [Dkt. No. 119, 12 Exh. 2, p. 2, ¶ III.A.]. 13 14 Dated: May 28, 2014 DAVIS, COWELL & BOWE, LLP 15 By: 16 17 /s/ John J. Davis, Jr. John J. Davis, Jr. Sarah Grossman-Swenson Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 19 ORDER 20 Pursuant to the Stipulation approved by Court Order on May 23, 2013 [Docket No. 119], 21 Defendant Homesite Services, Inc., is hereby dismissed with prejudice from the above-entitled 22 action. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 Dated:____June 2_____________, 2014 ______________________________ DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 1 Pls.’ Dismissal With Prejudice of Def. Homesite and [proposed] ORDER Case No. CV 11-3859 DMR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?