Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc.
Filing
25
ORDER Granting 24 Stipulation CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANT'S 9 MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Motion Hearing set for 12/22/2011 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Case Management Statement due by 12/15/2011. Case Management Conference set for 12/22/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/7/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Matthew R. Bainer, Esq. (S.B. #220972)
Hannah R. Salassi, Esq. (S.B. #230117)
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
1970 Broadway, Ninth Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 891-9800
Facsimile: (510) 891-7030
Email: mbainer@scalaw.com
Email: hsalassi@scalaw.com
Web: www.scalaw.com
Attorneys for Representative Plaintiff
and the Plaintiff Class
8
9
10
12
ATTORNEY’S AT LAW
THE WACHOVIA TOWER
1970 BROADWAY, NINTH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CA 94612
TEL: (510) 891-9800
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
11
13
Dominic J. Messiah, Esq. Bar No. 204544
Matthew J. Sharbaugh, Esq. Bar No. 260830
LITTLER MENDELSON,thP.C.
2049 Century Park East, 5 Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: 310-553-0308
Fax: 310-553-5583
Attorneys for Defendant
Nordstrom, Inc.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
17
18
FAINE DAVIS, individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
19
Plaintiff,
20
vs.
21
22
23
NORDSTROM, INC., and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:11-CV-3956-CW
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
24
25
26
27
28
-1Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference and Motion to Compel Arbitration
1
2
Plaintiff Faine Davis and Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “the Parties),
by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to the following:
3
WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference and Motion to Compel Arbitration
4
previously set for Thursday, December 8, 2011 in the above entitled action is continued to Thursday,
5
December 15, 2011;
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel are not available on December 15, 2011;
7
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred on this issue and have agreed that the Case
8
Management Conference and Motion to Compel Arbitration should be continued to Thursday,
9
December 22, 2011, as required by the Northern District Local Rules;
through their respective attorneys of record and subject to the approval of the Court, the Case
12
ATTORNEY’S AT LAW
THE WACHOVIA TOWER
1970 BROADWAY, NINTH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CA 94612
TEL: (510) 891-9800
NOW, IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties
11
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
10
Management Conference and Motion to Compel Arbitration currently set for December 15, 2011 be
13
continued to December 22, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
Dated: December 6, 2011
17
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
18
19
By: /s/ Hannah R. Salassi
Hannah R. Salassi, Esq.
Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiffs
and the Plaintiff Class
20
21
22
Dated: December 6, 2011
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
23
24
25
26
27
By: /s/ Matthew J. Sharbaugh
Matthew J. Sharbaugh, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
Nordstrom, Inc.
28
-2Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference and Motion to Compel Arbitration
PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
UPON GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, AND PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION
BETWEEN PARTIES, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Case Management Conference and Motion to Compel Arbitration is continued to December
22, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
12/7/2011
Dated: ______________________
______________________________
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge,
12
ATTORNEY’S AT LAW
THE WACHOVIA TOWER
1970 BROADWAY, NINTH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CA 94612
TEL: (510) 891-9800
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference and Motion to Compel Arbitration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?