Hofmann et al v. The City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 60

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying 55 Motion without prejudice; denying 56 Motion to Compel without prejudice. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 United States District Court Northern District of California 3 4 5 6 HEINZ HOFFMAN, et al., 7 Plaintiffs, 8 v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 9 10 Case No.: 4:11-cv-4016 CW (KAW) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On November 13, 2012, this matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore 13 for discovery purposes. The parties shall comply with Judge Westmore's General Standing Order, 14 available online at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/kaworders. As set out in the standing order, 15 with regard all discovery disputes, the parties must meet and confer in person, or by telephone if 16 an in-person conference is not feasible. If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute after the 17 meet and confer session, they shall file a joint meet and confer letter. Upon review of the parties' 18 letter, the Court will either order further briefing and/ or oral argument, or deem the matter 19 submitted on the papers. 20 Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel on November 8, 2012. Plaintiffs also filed a motion for 21 administrative relief to exceed the page limit for the motion to compel. These motions are hereby 22 denied without prejudice to the filing of a joint letter. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 DATE: November 15, 2012 ___________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?