Hofmann et al v. The City & County of San Francisco et al
Filing
60
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying 55 Motion without prejudice; denying 56 Motion to Compel without prejudice. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2012)
1
2
United States District Court
Northern District of California
3
4
5
6
HEINZ HOFFMAN, et al.,
7
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
9
10
Case No.: 4:11-cv-4016 CW (KAW)
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL AND MOTION TO EXCEED
PAGE LIMIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On November 13, 2012, this matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore
13
for discovery purposes. The parties shall comply with Judge Westmore's General Standing Order,
14
available online at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/kaworders. As set out in the standing order,
15
with regard all discovery disputes, the parties must meet and confer in person, or by telephone if
16
an in-person conference is not feasible. If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute after the
17
meet and confer session, they shall file a joint meet and confer letter. Upon review of the parties'
18
letter, the Court will either order further briefing and/ or oral argument, or deem the matter
19
submitted on the papers.
20
Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel on November 8, 2012. Plaintiffs also filed a motion for
21
administrative relief to exceed the page limit for the motion to compel. These motions are hereby
22
denied without prejudice to the filing of a joint letter.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
DATE: November 15, 2012
___________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?