Fa et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al

Filing 20

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/5/2011. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

MATIU K. FA and TOLIFILI FA,

5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

No. C 11-4024 CW

Plaintiff,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, as trustee for LONG
BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-8
ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES
2006-8; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, successor
in interest to WASHINGTON MUTUAL
BANK; ALL PERSONS CLAIMING BY,
THROUGH, OR UNDER SUCH PERSON, OR
PERSONS, ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN,
CLAIMING ANY LEGAL OR EQUITABLE
RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN, OR
INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN THIS COMPLAINT AS
"1635 WOLFE DRIVE SAN MATEO, CA
94402," ADVERSE TO THE
PLAINTIFFS' TITLE THERETO, OR ANY
CLOUD ON PLAINTIFFS' TITLE
THERETO and DOES 1 THROUGH 100,
INCLUSIVE,

ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS'
OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS' MOTION
TO DISMISS

Defendants.
________________________________/

19
20

On August 24, 2011, Defendants Deutsche Bank National Trust

21

Company, as trustee for Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-8

22

Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-8, and JPMorgan Chase Bank,

23

N.A. moved to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint, pursuant to Federal

24

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

25

to the undersigned, Defendants renoticed the motion to dismiss for

26

hearing on October 20, 2011.

27

motion.

28

to a motion not more than fourteen days after the motion is filed

After this case was reassigned

Plaintiffs have not opposed the

Civil Local Rule 7-3 requires the filing of an opposition

1

and served.

The parties are scheduled for an ADR phone conference

2

on October 11, 2011.

3

settlement at the ADR phone conference, Plaintiffs shall file

4

their opposition to the motion to dismiss on or before October 25,

5

2011, or face dismissal of their complaint for failure to

6

prosecute.

7

motion will be decided on the papers.

8

hearing is vacated.

9

Management Conference on December 6, 2011.

In the event that the parties do not reach a

Defendants may reply seven days thereafter.

The October 20, 2011

The parties are to appear for a Case
A joint case

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

The

management statement is due seven days prior to the Case

11

Management Conference.

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

Dated:

10/5/2011

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2