Protective Life Insurance Company v. Harris et al
ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing set for 4/10/2015 is CONTINUED to Friday, 5/8/2015 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Joint Statement filed five days prior. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/8/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Case No.: 11-CV-04027 YGR
ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING
CALVIN HARRIS, ET AL.,
Northern District of California
United States District Court
On December 16, 2014, the Court set a compliance hearing for April 10, 2015 regarding the
status of the probate proceedings justifying a stay of this action. (Dkt. No. 95.) On April 2, 2015, the
parties filed a joint status update and requested continuance of the April 10 hearing. (Dkt. No. 104.)
The Court hereby CONTINUES the April 10, 2015 hearing to May 8, 2015 on the Court’s 9:01 a.m.
calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1.
Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file either:
(1) a joint status update apprising the Court of the status of the probate proceedings, including the
events of the April 29, 2015 hearing, and advising the Court as to whether and when the motions for
summary judgment discussed on February 13, 2015 will be filed; or (2) a one-page joint statement
setting forth an explanation for their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need
not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be
allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: April 8, 2015
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?