Protective Life Insurance Company v. Harris et al

Filing 83

ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING RESOLUTION OF PROBATE PROCEEDING. Compliance Hearing is set for 5/17/2013 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/12/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 5 6 7 Plaintiff(s), Case No.: 11-CV-04027 YGR ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION OF PROBATE PROCEEDING vs. CALVIN HARRIS et al., 8 Defendant(s). 9 10 For the reasons set forth at the February 11, 2013 Case Management Conference, Defendant Northern District of California Cherie Cabral’s Motions to Change Venue (Dkt. Nos. 52 & 68) to the Alameda Probate Court are 12 United States District Court 11 DENIED, this action is STAYED pending resolution of the probate proceedings, and the parties are to 13 update the Court on the status of the probate proceedings every three months. 14 The Court sets this matter for a Compliance Hearing on Friday, May 17, 2013 at 9:01 a.m. to 15 confirm that counsel have filed the required status update. Five (5) business days prior to the date of 16 the Compliance Hearing, the parties must file a Status Update informing the Court of the status of the 17 probate proceedings. If compliance is complete and the Court deems a Status Hearing unnecessary, 18 the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. If, after reviewing 19 the parties’ Status Update, the Court deems the hearing necessary, then telephonic appearances will be 20 allowed. 21 22 Failure to file the Status Update or appear at the Status Hearing may result in sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal. 23 This Order terminates Dkt. Nos. 52 & 68. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 12, 2013 _____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?