Protective Life Insurance Company v. Harris et al
Filing
86
ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing set for 5/17/2013 is VACATED and RESET for Friday, 2/14/2014 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/16/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2013)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 11-CV-04027 YGR
ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING
vs.
CALVIN HARRIS et al.,
Defendant(s).
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
Having reviewed and considered the parties’ Joint Status Report/Update (Dkt. No. 85), the
13
Court is satisfied with the parties’ submission, and accordingly, VACATES the compliance hearing set
14
for May 17, 2013. Based on the representation that the parties do not anticipate the probate trial will
15
be set prior to December 2013, the parties are to provide the Court with an update on the status of the
16
probate proceedings in February 2014.
17
The Court sets this matter for another Compliance Hearing on Friday, February 14, 2014 on
18
the Court’s 9:01 a.m. Calendar to confirm that counsel file the required status update. Five (5)
19
business days prior to the date of the Compliance Hearing, the parties must file a Status Update
20
informing the Court of the status of the probate proceedings. If compliance is complete and the Court
21
deems a Status Hearing unnecessary, the parties need not appear and the hearing will be taken off
22
calendar. If, after reviewing the parties’ Status Update, the Court deems the hearing necessary, then
23
telephonic appearances will be allowed.
24
Failure to file the Status Update or appear at the Status Hearing may result in sanctions,
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Date: May 16, 2013
_________________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?