Protective Life Insurance Company v. Harris et al

Filing 86

ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing set for 5/17/2013 is VACATED and RESET for Friday, 2/14/2014 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/16/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, Case No.: 11-CV-04027 YGR ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING vs. CALVIN HARRIS et al., Defendant(s). 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 Having reviewed and considered the parties’ Joint Status Report/Update (Dkt. No. 85), the 13 Court is satisfied with the parties’ submission, and accordingly, VACATES the compliance hearing set 14 for May 17, 2013. Based on the representation that the parties do not anticipate the probate trial will 15 be set prior to December 2013, the parties are to provide the Court with an update on the status of the 16 probate proceedings in February 2014. 17 The Court sets this matter for another Compliance Hearing on Friday, February 14, 2014 on 18 the Court’s 9:01 a.m. Calendar to confirm that counsel file the required status update. Five (5) 19 business days prior to the date of the Compliance Hearing, the parties must file a Status Update 20 informing the Court of the status of the probate proceedings. If compliance is complete and the Court 21 deems a Status Hearing unnecessary, the parties need not appear and the hearing will be taken off 22 calendar. If, after reviewing the parties’ Status Update, the Court deems the hearing necessary, then 23 telephonic appearances will be allowed. 24 Failure to file the Status Update or appear at the Status Hearing may result in sanctions, 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Date: May 16, 2013 _________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?