Protective Life Insurance Company v. Harris et al
Filing
99
ORDER RE PRE-FILING CONFERENCE REQUEST re 98 Letter filed by Cherie Cabral, 96 Letter filed by Cherie Cabral. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/22/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 11-CV-04027 YGR
ORDER RE PRE-FILING CONFERENCE
REQUEST
v.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 96, 98
CALVIN HARRIS, ET AL.,
Defendants.
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
On January 14, 2015, defendant Cherie Cabral filed a letter requesting the Court schedule a
13
pre-filing conference in connection with a contemplated motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No.
14
96.) On January 16, 2015, defendant Calvin Harris filed a response noting the January 14 letter did
15
not address the substantive basis for the planned motion and requesting an alternative date. (Dkt. No.
16
97.) On January 21, 2015, Cabral filed a response thereto, agreeing to the alternative date and
17
stating: “we . . . will timely file our letter brief seven days prior to the scheduled conference.” (Dkt.
18
No. 98 at 2-3.)
19
Cabral’s filings do not comply with this Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases, Paragraph
20
9(a). Those instructions require the filing of a letter brief, at least seven business days prior to the
21
proposed conference date, that explains the grounds for the motion in no more than three single-
22
spaced pages. The Court will not set a date for a pre-filing conference until movant submits a proper
23
letter brief and the deadline for a response has passed. Therefore, the Court DENIES WITHOUT
24
PREJUDICE Cabral’s requests that the Court schedule a pre-filing conference.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Date: January 22, 2015
_________________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?