Nijem v. U.S. Bankcorp et al

Filing 18

ORDER Granting 16 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/21/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2011)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HAISAM NIJEM CASE NO. C 11-04042 CW Plaintiff(s), v. U.S. BANCORP dba U.S. BANK, a Delaware Corporation, et al. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: TBD 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ ✔ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 ✔ March 30, 2012 other requested deadline _____________________________________________ 11/16/2011 Dated:___________ /s/ Beth Mora ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff 11/16/2011 Dated:____________ /s/ Brian L. Johnsrud ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation X 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. 3/30/2012 X 9 other ___________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. 11/21/2011 Dated:________________ ___________________________________ DISTRICT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?