Vigilos LLC v. Sling Media Inc et al

Filing 83

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Case referred to early neutral evaluation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/21/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)

Download PDF
Case4:11-cv-04117-SBA Document81 Filed02/14/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT Marc A. Fenster, Calif. State Bar No. 181,067 E-mail: mfenster@raklaw.com Bruce D. Kuyper, Calif. State Bar No. 144,969 E-mail: bkuyper@raklaw.com Benjamin T. Wang, Calif. State Bar No. 228,712 E-mail: bwang@raklaw.com 12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone: (310) 826-7474 Facsimile: (310) 826-6991 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Vigilos, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 Vigilos, LLC, STIPULATION AND XXXXXXXXXXX [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Plaintiff, 14 15 Case No. 4:11-cv-04117-SBA v. 16 Sling Media, Inc., et al. 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process: ENE. Dated: February 14, 2012 s/Bruce D. Kuyper _____________________ Attorney for Plaintiff Vigilos, LLC Dated: February 14, 2012 s/Scott C. Moore _______________________ Attorney for Defendants, Sling Media, Inc., EchoStar Technologies, L.L.C., EchoStar Corporation, and DISH Network L.L.C. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS – Case No. 4:11-cv-04117-SBA 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case4:11-cv-04117-SBA Document81 Filed02/14/12 Page2 of 3 1 2 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN ELECTRONIC FILING In accordance with General Order 45, section X(B), I attest that I have obtained 3 concurrence from Scott C. Moore in the filing of this stipulation. 4 Dated: February 14, 2012 s/Bruce D. Kuyper 5 6 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 10 Dated: 2/21/12 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS – Case No. 4:11-cv-04117-SBA 2 Case4:11-cv-04117-SBA Document81 Filed02/14/12 Page3 of 3 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that, on February 14, 2012, the foregoing document was filed electronically 3 using the CM/ECF system. In accordance with General Order 45, Section IX(B), the automatic 4 e-mail message generated by the ECF system and sent to all parties whose e-mail addresses have 5 been registered in the case constitutes service on the attorney or other persons in this case. 6 7 8 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 14, 2012. 9 s/Bruce D. Kuyper RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS – Case No. 4:11-cv-04117-SBA 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?