Vigilos LLC v. Sling Media Inc et al
Filing
83
STIPULATION AND ORDER, Case referred to early neutral evaluation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/21/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)
Case4:11-cv-04117-SBA Document81 Filed02/14/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
Marc A. Fenster, Calif. State Bar No. 181,067
E-mail: mfenster@raklaw.com
Bruce D. Kuyper, Calif. State Bar No. 144,969
E-mail: bkuyper@raklaw.com
Benjamin T. Wang, Calif. State Bar No. 228,712
E-mail: bwang@raklaw.com
12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: (310) 826-7474
Facsimile: (310) 826-6991
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Vigilos, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
Vigilos, LLC,
STIPULATION AND XXXXXXXXXXX
[PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No. 4:11-cv-04117-SBA
v.
16
Sling Media, Inc., et al.
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process: ENE.
Dated: February 14, 2012
s/Bruce D. Kuyper _____________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
Vigilos, LLC
Dated: February 14, 2012
s/Scott C. Moore _______________________
Attorney for Defendants,
Sling Media, Inc.,
EchoStar Technologies, L.L.C.,
EchoStar Corporation, and
DISH Network L.L.C.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS – Case
No. 4:11-cv-04117-SBA
1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case4:11-cv-04117-SBA Document81 Filed02/14/12 Page2 of 3
1
2
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN ELECTRONIC FILING
In accordance with General Order 45, section X(B), I attest that I have obtained
3
concurrence from Scott C. Moore in the filing of this stipulation.
4
Dated: February 14, 2012
s/Bruce D. Kuyper
5
6
7
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
10
Dated: 2/21/12
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS – Case
No. 4:11-cv-04117-SBA
2
Case4:11-cv-04117-SBA Document81 Filed02/14/12 Page3 of 3
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that, on February 14, 2012, the foregoing document was filed electronically
3
using the CM/ECF system. In accordance with General Order 45, Section IX(B), the automatic
4
e-mail message generated by the ECF system and sent to all parties whose e-mail addresses have
5
been registered in the case constitutes service on the attorney or other persons in this case.
6
7
8
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on February 14, 2012.
9
s/Bruce D. Kuyper
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS – Case
No. 4:11-cv-04117-SBA
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?