Injazat Technology Fund B.S.C. v. Najafi et al

Filing 125

Order Granting 124 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines and Continue Hearing. Motions due by 7/31/2013. Responses due by 8/14/2013. Replies due by 8/21/2013. Motion Hearing set for 8/28/2013 at 1:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 07/16/2013. (nclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 INJAZAT TECHNOLOGY FUND B.S.C., Case No. 11-cv-04133 PJH (NC) 9 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE HEARING 10 Judgment Creditor, v. 11 DR. HAMID NAJAFI, 12 Re: Dkt. No. 124 Judgment Debtor. 13 14 The Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulation to postpone the briefing schedule and 15 hearing set by the Court on July 12, 2013 pending settlement discussions. The briefing 16 schedule is revised as follows: 17 1. Najafi shall file and serve his brief in support of his contention that the Options 18 are “earnings” for purposes of Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §706.011 on or before July 31, 19 2013; 20 2. Injazat shall file and serve its responsive brief on or before August 14, 2013; 21 3. Najafi may file a reply brief on or before August 21, 2013; 22 4. The matter will be heard on August 28, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom A, 15th 23 Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California; 24 5. Any third party intending to appear at the August 28 hearing to assert an interest 25 in the Rent Proceeds must file a notice of appearance by August 21, 2013. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Date: July 16, 2013 28 Case No. 11-cv-04133 PJH (NC) ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?