Injazat Technology Fund B.S.C. v. Najafi et al
Filing
125
Order Granting 124 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines and Continue Hearing. Motions due by 7/31/2013. Responses due by 8/14/2013. Replies due by 8/21/2013. Motion Hearing set for 8/28/2013 at 1:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 07/16/2013. (nclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
7
8 INJAZAT TECHNOLOGY FUND B.S.C.,
Case No. 11-cv-04133 PJH (NC)
9
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND CONTINUE HEARING
10
Judgment Creditor,
v.
11 DR. HAMID NAJAFI,
12
Re: Dkt. No. 124
Judgment Debtor.
13
14
The Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulation to postpone the briefing schedule and
15 hearing set by the Court on July 12, 2013 pending settlement discussions. The briefing
16 schedule is revised as follows:
17
1. Najafi shall file and serve his brief in support of his contention that the Options
18
are “earnings” for purposes of Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §706.011 on or before July 31,
19
2013;
20
2. Injazat shall file and serve its responsive brief on or before August 14, 2013;
21
3. Najafi may file a reply brief on or before August 21, 2013;
22
4. The matter will be heard on August 28, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom A, 15th
23
Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California;
24
5. Any third party intending to appear at the August 28 hearing to assert an interest
25
in the Rent Proceeds must file a notice of appearance by August 21, 2013.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Date: July 16, 2013
28
Case No. 11-cv-04133 PJH (NC)
ORDER REVISING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING
_________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?