Harris v. Virga
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS STATUS AND DENYING
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
Petitioner,
v.
TIM VIRGA, Warden,
Respondent.
16
17
No. C 11-04304 SBA (PR)
MARVIN HARRIS,
/
Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
18
U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. He has also requested
19
appointment of counsel in this action.
20
The Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not apply in habeas corpus actions. See
21
Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722, 728 (9th Cir. 1986). Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B),
22
however, authorizes a district court to appoint counsel to represent a habeas petitioner whenever "the
23
court determines that the interests of justice so require" and such person is financially unable to
24
obtain representation. The decision to appoint counsel is within the discretion of the district court.
25
See Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986); Knaubert, 791 F.2d at 728; Bashor v.
26
Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir. 1984). The courts have made appointment of counsel the
27
exception rather than the rule by limiting it to: (1) capital cases; (2) cases that turn on substantial and
28
complex procedural, legal or mixed legal and factual questions; (3) cases involving uneducated or
1
mentally or physically impaired petitioners; (4) cases likely to require the assistance of experts either
2
in framing or in trying the claims; (5) cases in which petitioner is in no position to investigate crucial
3
facts; and (6) factually complex cases. See generally 1 J. Liebman & R. Hertz, Federal Habeas
4
Corpus Practice and Procedure § 12.3b at 383-86 (2d ed. 1994). Appointment is mandatory only
5
when the circumstances of a particular case indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent
6
due process violations. See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196; Eskridge v. Rhay, 345 F.2d 778, 782 (9th
7
Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 996 (1966).
8
At this early stage of the proceedings the Court is unable to determine whether the
require appointment of counsel at this time, and Petitioner's request is DENIED. This denial is
11
For the Northern District of California
appointment of counsel is mandated for Petitioner. Accordingly, the interests of justice do not
10
United States District Court
9
without prejudice to the Court's sua sponte reconsideration should the Court find an evidentiary
12
hearing necessary following consideration of the merits of Petitioner's claims.
13
14
Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court will review
Petitioner's habeas petition in a separate written Order.
15
This Order terminates Docket nos. 5 and 8.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated:
10/21/11
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.11\Harris4304.Atty-IFP.wpd
2
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
MARVIN HARRIS,
Case Number: CV11-04304 SBA
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
T. VIRGA et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on October 25, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
15
16
17
18
19
Marvin Harris #D-99649
New Folsom State Prison
P.O. Box 29006
Represa, CA 95671
Dated: October 25, 2011
20
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.11\Harris4304.Atty-IFP.wpd
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?