Corelleone et al v. Grounds et al
Filing
10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/30/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2012)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
OAKLAND DIVISION
6
7
ACHILLES CORELLEONE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 11-4338 PJH (PR)
vs.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
RANDY GROUNDS; MATHEW CATE;
BILL ZIKA, PhD; V. LOMELLI; Capt.
MARTINEZ; D. FOSTER; C.D.
REECE; L. KENNAMORE; and JOHN
DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
/
14
15
This is a civil rights case filed pro se by a state prisoner. The complaint was
16
dismissed with leave to amend because plaintiff had provided only “the most conclusory
17
allegations . . . .” The court set out the pleading standard described in Bell Atlantic Corp. v.
18
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009), and
19
concluded that the allegations were far from sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief.
20
Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to amend (document number 8 on the docket) is
21
GRANTED. The amendment is deemed timely.
22
The amendment is not an improvement on the original complaint. In the “Grounds
23
for Relief” section, plaintiff merely lists his claims; for instance: “Claim One: Violation of
24
Due process placing me on “C/C” (hard C status) for an administrative Rules Violation
25
Report for 5 month[s] & 1 day; Claim Two: Violation of Due Process by misclassifying
26
RVR’s and putting me on “C” status for 90 days or more,” and so on. There are no factual
27
allegations as to what each defendant actually did that purportedly violated his rights, and
28
no factual allegations that suggest the violation of federal law.
1
Plaintiff was afforded an opportunity to plead facts what would plausibly give rise to
2
an entitlement to relief, and has not done so. The case is DISMISSED for failure to state a
3
claim. The clerk shall close the file.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: July 30, 2012.
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\PJH\CR.11\CORELLEONE4338.dsm.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?