Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Mendoza et al

Filing 54

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response by Defendant Abitsch & Abitsch due by 4/12/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/5/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/5/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE CO,

9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff(s),

No. C-11-04398 DMR

EDUARDO MENDOZA,

12

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

13
14

Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss and strike portions of Defendant

15

Abitsch & Abitsch, LLC’s counterclaim is set for a hearing on April 26, 2012. Pursuant to Civil

16

Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion was due on March 23, 2012, but

17

Defendant filed neither an opposition nor a statement of nonopposition to the motion as required by

18

Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). Defendant Abitsch & Abitsch is hereby ordered to show cause for its

19

failure to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or, alternatively, to file a statement of

20

nonopposition in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) and (b). Defendant Abitsch & Abitsch

21

must file its response to this order to show cause, or file its notice of nonopposition to the motion to

22

dismiss, by no later than April 12, 2012. This order to show cause does not constitute permission to

23

file a late opposition. Defendant's failure to respond to the order to show cause may result in

24

dismissal of portions of Abitsch & Abitsch’s counterclaim.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 5, 2012

27
28

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge