Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Mendoza et al
Filing
98
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/12/2012. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE CO,
No. C 11-04398 DMR
Plaintiff(s),
11
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
12
EDUARDO MENDOZA,
13
14
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
15
On August 22, 2012, a case management conference was scheduled before this court in the
16
above-entitled case. The only remaining claim in this case is Abitsch & Abitsch, LLC’s cross-claim
17
against Cross-Defendant Litz. [See Docket No. 91.] Defendant Abitsch & Abitsch, LLC and Cross18
Defendant Alan Litz did not appear. The court ordered those parties to show cause in writing why
19
they did not appear at the case management conference and why this action should not be dismissed
20
for their failure to appear. [Docket No. 94.] Abitsch & Abitsch, LLC did not respond to the Order
21
to Show Cause. Therefore, the court dismisses Abisch & Abitsch, LLC’s cross-claim against Cross22
Defendant Litz without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to close the case
file.
24
u
S
RT
onn
Judge D
H
ER
FO
a M. Ry
NO
28
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
LI
27
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
A
Dated: September 12, 2012
26
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
23
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?