Trevillion v. Dillon et al

Filing 34

ORDER re 19 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases. Order finding referral to be moot. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EUREKA DIVISION 8 KIM Y. TREVILLION, 10 Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 No. 11-CV-4077 PJH ORDER RE REFERENCE (Doc. 19.) v. 12 HARRY E. DILLION, et al., 13 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 14 15 On October 24, 2011, District Judge Hamilton referred this case to the undersigned for 16 consideration of whether this case is related to 11-4099 NJV. (Civil L.R. 3-12). The time for filing 17 an opposition or statement of support has passed. However, on November 14, 2011, Defendants 18 filed a declination to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 31.) Accordingly, the 19 undersigned is precluded from hearing the present case and the issue of relation has become moot. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 15, 2011 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EUREKA DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 18 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. HARRY E. DILLON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 No. 11-CV-4099 NJV KIM Y. TREVILLION, / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on November 15, 2011, I served a true and correct copy of the attached by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person listed below, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. 20 21 22 23 24 Kim Y. Trevillion 2031 F Street Apt. 1 Eureka, CA 95501-3773 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 15, 2011 Linn Van Meter Administrative Law Clerk to the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?