Flores v. Kardosh et al

Filing 28

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE WITH COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION FOR 90 DAYS, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/5/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2012)

Download PDF
4 TOMAS E. MARGAIN, (SBN 193555) DAL BON & MARGAIN APC 28 NORTH 1ST SUITE 700 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 TEL (408) 297-4729 FAX (408) 297-4728 margainlaw@hotmail.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff JASON FLORES 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 KASSRA P. NASSIRI (SBN 215405) MICHAEL P. DILLINGHAM (SBN 244086) NASSIRI & JUNG LLP 47 KEARNY ST., SUITE 700 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 TEL: (415) 762-3100 FAX: (415) 534-3200 knassiri@nassiri-jung.com mdillingham@nassiri-jung.com Attorneys for Defendants MOUNIR KARDOSH and NAZARETH ENTERPRISES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 JASON S. FLORES, 17 Plaintiff, 18 vs. 19 20 Case No.: CV11-04511 YRG ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE WITH COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION FOR NINETY (90) DAYS; [PROPOSED] ORDER MOUNIR KARDOSH; and NAZARETH ENTERPRISES, INC. 21 Defendants. 22 Plaintiff JASON S. FLORES and Defendants MOUNIR KARDOSH; and NAZARETH 23 24 ENTERPRISES, INC.(collectively, “Defendants”) through their attorneys of record hereby submit the following stipulation. 25 26 27 1. The parties have executed a written settlement agreement which disposes of all claims in this matter; 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION 1 1 2. 2 3 The settlement agreement calls for consideration to be paid over a sixty day period; and 3. 4 The parties desire to have this matter dismissed with prejudice but to have the Court exercise jurisdiction over the settlement. 5 6 FOR PLAINTIFF 7 DAL BON & MARGAIN 8 9 DATED: June 20, 2012 By: //s// Tomas E. Margain Tomas E. Margain 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 FOR DEFENDANTS DATED: June 20, 2012 NASSIRI & JUNG LLP By: //s// Michael P. Dillingham Michael P. Dillingham Attorneys for Defendants MOUNIR KARDOSH and NAZARETH ENTERPRISES, INC 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION 2 ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that this case be Dismissed with prejudice. However, the Court retains jurisdiction 4 of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the settlement agreement for a period of no more 5 6 7 ninety (90) days from the date of entry of this order. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 Dated: July 5, 2012 _______________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?