Flores v. Kardosh et al
Filing
28
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE WITH COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION FOR 90 DAYS, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/5/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2012)
4
TOMAS E. MARGAIN, (SBN 193555)
DAL BON & MARGAIN APC
28 NORTH 1ST SUITE 700
SAN JOSE, CA 95113
TEL (408) 297-4729
FAX (408) 297-4728
margainlaw@hotmail.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff JASON FLORES
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
KASSRA P. NASSIRI (SBN 215405)
MICHAEL P. DILLINGHAM (SBN 244086)
NASSIRI & JUNG LLP
47 KEARNY ST., SUITE 700
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108
TEL: (415) 762-3100
FAX: (415) 534-3200
knassiri@nassiri-jung.com
mdillingham@nassiri-jung.com
Attorneys for Defendants MOUNIR KARDOSH
and NAZARETH ENTERPRISES, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
JASON S. FLORES,
17
Plaintiff,
18
vs.
19
20
Case No.: CV11-04511 YRG
ORDER ON
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE WITH COURT TO RETAIN
JURISDICTION FOR NINETY (90)
DAYS; [PROPOSED] ORDER
MOUNIR KARDOSH; and NAZARETH
ENTERPRISES, INC.
21
Defendants.
22
Plaintiff JASON S. FLORES and Defendants MOUNIR KARDOSH; and NAZARETH
23
24
ENTERPRISES, INC.(collectively, “Defendants”) through their attorneys of record hereby
submit the following stipulation.
25
26
27
1.
The parties have executed a written settlement agreement which disposes of all
claims in this matter;
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION
1
1
2.
2
3
The settlement agreement calls for consideration to be paid over a sixty day
period; and
3.
4
The parties desire to have this matter dismissed with prejudice but to have the
Court exercise jurisdiction over the settlement.
5
6
FOR PLAINTIFF
7
DAL BON & MARGAIN
8
9
DATED:
June 20, 2012
By: //s// Tomas E. Margain
Tomas E. Margain
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
FOR DEFENDANTS
DATED:
June 20, 2012
NASSIRI & JUNG LLP
By: //s// Michael P. Dillingham
Michael P. Dillingham
Attorneys for Defendants
MOUNIR KARDOSH and
NAZARETH ENTERPRISES, INC
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION
2
ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY
3
ORDERED that this case be Dismissed with prejudice. However, the Court retains jurisdiction
4
of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the settlement agreement for a period of no more
5
6
7
ninety (90) days from the date of entry of this order.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO
ORDERED.
8
9
10
Dated: July 5, 2012
_______________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?