Gutierrez v. United States
Filing
15
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 13 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to respond to the Court's 12/14/11 Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend. The time in which Petitioner may respond will be extended up to and including 30 days from the date of this Order. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2012)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
No. C 11-4527 YGR (pr)
JOSEPH P. GUTIERREZ,
5
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO THE COURT'S
DECEMBER 14, 2011 ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
Petitioner,
6
vs.
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
8
Respondent.
9
/
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Before the Court is Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to respond to the Court's
December 14, 2011 Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend.
Good cause appearing, the request is GRANTED. The time in which Petitioner may respond
will be extended up to and including thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If Petitioner fails
to respond within the thirty-day deadline, this case will be closed for failure to prosecute under Rule
41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 633 (1962)
(pursuant to Rule 41(b), a district court may sua sponte dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or
to comply with a court order); see also Malone v. United States Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 133 (9th
Cir. 1987) (the district court should afford the litigant prior notice before dismissing for failure to
prosecute).
This Order terminates Docket no. 13.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 26, 2012
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\YGR\HC.11\Gutierrez4527.EOT-AmPet.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?