Gutierrez v. United States

Filing 15

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 13 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to respond to the Court's 12/14/11 Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend. The time in which Petitioner may respond will be extended up to and including 30 days from the date of this Order. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 No. C 11-4527 YGR (pr) JOSEPH P. GUTIERREZ, 5 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COURT'S DECEMBER 14, 2011 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND Petitioner, 6 vs. 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 Respondent. 9 / United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Before the Court is Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to respond to the Court's December 14, 2011 Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend. Good cause appearing, the request is GRANTED. The time in which Petitioner may respond will be extended up to and including thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If Petitioner fails to respond within the thirty-day deadline, this case will be closed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 633 (1962) (pursuant to Rule 41(b), a district court may sua sponte dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order); see also Malone v. United States Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 133 (9th Cir. 1987) (the district court should afford the litigant prior notice before dismissing for failure to prosecute). This Order terminates Docket no. 13. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 26, 2012 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\YGR\HC.11\Gutierrez4527.EOT-AmPet.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?